首页> 外文期刊>International review of automatic control >Comparison of Control Strategies Applied to Nonlinear Quarterly Car Passive Suspension System
【24h】

Comparison of Control Strategies Applied to Nonlinear Quarterly Car Passive Suspension System

机译:非线性季度汽车被动悬架系统控制策略的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Road unevenness causes wheel and engine vibration which in turn lead to internal noise in automobiles. Developing a reliable control algorithm for vehicle suspension system is quite cumbersome due to the nonlinear nature of the system coupled with the issue of improving compromise between the conflicting demands of ride comfort and road handling. This paper presents a comparison of Fuzzy, Neural Network (NN) inverse control and Nonlinear Proportional Integral Derivative (NPID) control applied to the quarterly car passive suspension system. The performances of the controllers were evaluated based on rise time, settling time and peak time as illustrated via set-points tracking. The simulation results indicated that the performances of the Fuzzy controller and NPID are slightly better than neural network inverse control which could be due to lack of obtaining an accurate inverse plant model. The Fuzzy controller and NPID may serve as an alternative and valuable control schemes for the system.
机译:道路不平整会引起车轮和发动机振动,进而导致汽车内部产生噪音。由于系统的非线性特性以及改善乘坐舒适性和道路操纵的冲突需求之间的折衷的问题,因此为车辆悬架系统开发可靠的控制算法非常麻烦。本文对应用于季度汽车被动悬架系统的模糊神经网络(NN)逆控制与非线性比例积分微分(NPID)控制进行了比较。控制器的性能是根据上升时间,建立时间和峰值时间进行评估的,如设定点跟踪所示。仿真结果表明,模糊控制器和NPID的性能略优于神经网络逆控制,这可能是由于缺乏准确的逆工厂模型所致。模糊控制器和NPID可以作为系统的替代性和有价值的控制方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号