首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >A comparative study of both standard and adaptive versions of threshold accepting and simulated annealing algorithms in three scheduling problems
【24h】

A comparative study of both standard and adaptive versions of threshold accepting and simulated annealing algorithms in three scheduling problems

机译:三种调度问题中阈值接受和模拟退火算法的标准版和自适应版的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Local search techniques are reported to be effective for many optimization problems with arbitrary objective functions and constraints. This paper compares simulated annealing with a less frequently mentioned approach, threshold accepting. Three scheduling problems of jobs with arbitrary time lags in a single-server system are considered. The optimization criteria used are maximum completion time and mean completion time. Two adaptive versions of both techniques: the adaptive neighbourhood search and the adaptive temperature/threshold values are proposed which guide the future search according to the recent search performance. These adaptive concepts prove to be effective and may be applied into other local search techniques. Computational results show that threshold accepting algorithms achieve better or comparable performance with simulated annealing in the standard and adaptive versions. Incorporating descent approaches into threshold accepting may lead to substantial improvement.
机译:据报道,局部搜索技术对于具有任意目标函数和约束的许多优化问题是有效的。本文将模拟退火与较少提及的阈值接受方法进行了比较。考虑了单服务器系统中具有任意时滞的三个作业调度问题。使用的优化标准是最大完成时间和平均完成时间。提出了两种技术的两种自适应版本:自适应邻域搜索和自适应温度/阈值,它们根据最近的搜索性能指导将来的搜索。这些自适应概念被证明是有效的,并且可以应用于其他本地搜索技术。计算结果表明,在标准版本和自适应版本中,阈值接受算法通过模拟退火可以实现更好或相当的性能。将下降方法纳入阈值接受范围可能会导致实质性的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号