首页> 外文期刊>European urology >A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
【24h】

A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

机译:上,尿路上皮癌辅助化疗和新辅助化疗的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) remains poorly defined for the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), although some studies suggest a benefit. Objective To update the current evidence on the role of NC and AC for UTUC patients. Evidence acquisition We searched for all studies investigating NC or AC for UTUC in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings prior to February 2014. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Evidence synthesis No randomized trials investigated the role of AC for UTUC. There was one prospective study (n = 36) investigating adjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel and nine retrospective studies, with a total of 482 patients receiving cisplatin-based or non-cisplatin-based AC after nephroureterectomy (NU) and 1300 patients receiving NU alone. Across three cisplatin-based studies, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.89; p = 0.023) compared with those who received surgery alone. For disease-free survival (DFS), the pooled HR across two studies was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.24-0.99; p = 0.048). Benefit was not seen for non-cisplatin-based regimens. For NC, two phase 2 trials demonstrated favorable pathologic downstaging rates, with 3-yr OS and disease-specific survival (DSS) ≤93%. Across two retrospective studies investigating NC, there was a DSS benefit, with a pooled HR of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.22-0.76; p = 0.005). Conclusions There appears to be an OS and DFS benefit for cisplatin-based AC in UTUC. This evidence is limited by the retrospective nature of studies and their relatively small sample size. NC appears to be promising, but more trials are needed to confirm its utility. Patient summary After a comprehensive search of studies examining the role of chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cancer, the pooled evidence shows that cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial for prolonging survival.
机译:背景辅助化学疗法(AC)或新辅助化学疗法(NC)在上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的管理中的作用仍然不明确,尽管一些研究表明是有益的。目的更新有关NC和AC在UTUC患者中作用的最新证据。证据收集我们在Medline,Embase,Cochrane对照试验中央注册簿以及2014年2月之前的美国临床肿瘤学会会议摘要中搜索了所有有关UTUC的NC或AC研究,并进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。 。证据综合没有随机试验研究AC对UTUC的作用。一项前瞻性研究(n = 36)用于研究卡铂-紫杉醇辅助治疗,九项回顾性研究,共有482例肾癌切除术后(NU)接受顺铂或非顺铂AC的患者,仅1300例接受NU的患者。在三项基于顺铂的研究中,与仅接受手术的患者相比,总生存率(OS)的合并危险比(HR)为0.43(95%置信区间[CI],0.21-0.89; p = 0.023)。对于无病生存期(DFS),两项研究的合并HR为0.49(95%CI,0.24-0.99; p = 0.048)。非基于顺铂的方案未见获益。对于NC,两项2期试验显示出良好的病理学降级率,3年OS和疾病特异性生存率(DSS)≤93%。在两项调查NC的回顾性研究中,DSS有益处,合并的HR为0.41(95%CI,0.22-0.76; p = 0.005)。结论UTUC中基于顺铂的AC似乎具有OS和DFS优势。该证据受研究的回顾性及其相对较小的样本量的限制。 NC似乎很有希望,但是需要更多的试验来确认其实用性。患者总结在全面研究了化疗在上尿路尿路上皮癌中的作用的研究后,汇总的证据显示,基于顺铂的辅助化疗对延长生存期有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号