首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: Official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery >Comparison of surgical and interventional therapy of native and recurrent aortic coarctation regarding different age groups during childhood.
【24h】

Comparison of surgical and interventional therapy of native and recurrent aortic coarctation regarding different age groups during childhood.

机译:比较儿童期不同年龄段的自然主动脉缩窄和复发性主动脉缩窄的手术和介入治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze immediate results, rate of complications and re-interventions during medium-term outcome in pediatric patients with native or recurrent aortic coarctation. We focused on an age-related therapeutic approach comparing surgical and trans-catheter treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-centre, clinical observational trial including 91 consecutive patients (age: 1 day-18 years) treated for native coarctation in 67 and recurrent aortic coarctation in 24 patients. Surgical treatment was performed in 56, trans-catheter treatment with balloon dilatation in 17, and by stent implantation in 18 patients. According to the age groups, we treated 48 children in group A (<6 months of age), 16 in group B (6 months-6 years), and 27 in group C (>6 years). A total of 41 patients in group A were operated (85%), patients in group B received either surgical or trans-catheter treatment (50% vs 50%), and 16 patients in group C were treated by stent implantation (62%). RESULTS: Immediate results were excellent with a significant release of pressure gradient in all three age groups (64.7% in group A, 69.1% in group B, and 63.3% in group C). Complication rate and re-intervention rate (surgical and interventional) were both comparable between the three age groups (complications: group A 8.3%, group B 6.3%, and group C 3.7%; re-interventions: group A 16.6%, group B 18.8%, and group C 18.5%). Midterm outcome after a median follow-up period of 17.5 months was satisfactory with a re-intervention-free survival after 17.5 months of 83.4%, 81.2%, and 81.5% in group A, group B, and group C, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current strategy of an age-related therapy for native and recurrent aortic coarctation in our institution is surgery in infants <6 months (group A), either surgery or balloon dilatation in younger patients <6 years (group B), while in older children >6 years of age (group C) the trans-catheter treatment with stent implantation is an excellent alternative to surgery. Balloon dilatations showed limited results with an overall re-intervention rate of 53% and, therefore, should mainly be performed as a rescue procedure or in recurrent aortic coarctation in neonates.
机译:目的:本研究旨在分析患有自然或复发性主动脉缩窄的儿科患者的近期结果,并发症发生率以及中期结局中的再次干预。我们专注于与年龄相关的治疗方法,比较外科手术和经导管治疗。方法:这是一项回顾性,单中心,临床观察性试验,包括91例连续患者(年龄:1天至18岁),其中67例因自然狭窄而复发,而24例复发性主动脉缩窄。手术治疗56例,经导管治疗,球囊扩张术17例,支架植入术18例。根据年龄组,我们治疗了A组48岁以下儿童(<6个月),B组16名儿童(6个月至6岁)和C组27名儿童(> 6岁)。 A组共手术41例(85%),B组接受手术或经导管治疗(50%vs 50%),C组16例接受支架植入治疗(62%) 。结果:三个年龄组的压力梯度均显着释放(A组为64.7%,B组为69.1%,C组为63.3%),即时结果极佳。三个年龄组的并发症发生率和再次干预率(外科和介入性)均相当(并发症:A组为8.3%,B组为6.3%,C组为3.7%;再干预:A组为16.6%,B组18.8%,C组18.5%)。 A组,B组和C组中位随访17.5个月后的中期结果令人满意,在17.5个月后的无干预生存率分别为83.4%,81.2%和81.5%。结论:我们机构目前与年龄相关的自然和复发性主动脉缩窄的治疗策略是对<6个月的婴儿进行手术(A组),对<6岁的年轻患者进行手术或球囊扩张术(B组),而对于年龄大于6岁的较大儿童(C组)采用支架置入术经导管治疗是手术的极佳替代方案。球囊扩张术的结果有限,总体再介入率为53%,因此,应主要作为抢救程序或新生儿的主动脉缩窄进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号