首页> 外文期刊>Ethology >Behavioral Epiphenomena Revisited: Reply to Skok and Skorjanc
【24h】

Behavioral Epiphenomena Revisited: Reply to Skok and Skorjanc

机译:行为行为现象再访:回复Skok和Skorjanc

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a recent article in this journal, Ethology, 2014 present arguments as to why fighting in piglets during suckling may not be an epiphenomenon as we had previously suggested Ethology, 119, 2013, 353 and provide several alternative explanations. Although the new information Skok and Skorjanc bring to this debate is carefully considered and important, I argue here that it is not sufficient to counter our original claim that fighting among piglets (and kittens) during suckling may be an epiphenomenon, a largely inconsequential by-product, of developmental processes anticipating the use of these behaviors and associated anatomical structures in later functional contexts. However, the points Skok and Skorjanc raise contribute importantly to identifying areas where further information and experimental work are needed to resolve this and related behavioral issues. I therefore conclude that this debate, independent of any particular final outcome, constructively points to the general difficulty and need for caution in interpreting behavior in seemingly 'obvious' functional terms, and particularly during development
机译:在《 Ethology》(《伦理学》,2014年)的最新文章中,提出了关于为什么在哺乳期间在仔猪中打架可能不是一个现象的争论,正如我们先前在《 Ethology》(119、2013、353)中所提出的那样,并提供了多种替代解释。尽管Skok和Skorjanc为这场辩论带来的新信息经过仔细考虑并且很重要,但我在这里辩称,这不足以抵消我们最初的主张,即哺乳期间小猪(和小猫)之间的战斗可能是一种现象,这在很大程度上是不重要的-产品,预期在以后的功能环境中使用这些行为和相关的解剖结构。但是,Skok和Skorjanc提出​​的观点对确定需要进一步信息和实验工作来解决此问题及相关行为问题的领域做出了重要贡献。因此,我得出的结论是,这场辩论与任何特定的最终结果无关,都建设性地指出了一般的困难,并且需要谨慎地以看似“显而易见”的功能术语来解释行为,尤其是在开发过程中

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethology》 |2014年第8期|共3页
  • 作者

    Hudson R;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 动物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号