首页> 外文期刊>Economic Policy: A European Forum >Price setting and inflation persistence: did EMU matter?
【24h】

Price setting and inflation persistence: did EMU matter?

机译:价格设定和通货膨胀持续性:动车组重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Surprisingly not;or at least not directly. Using data on individual consumer prices and on sectoral inflation rates from six euro area countries spanning several years before and after the introduction of the euro,we look at whether EMU has altered the behaviour of price setters and/or the dynamics of inflation. We find no evidence of such change in 1999,when the euro was introduced as an electronic unit of account. At the start of 2002,when the paper currency appeared,the frequency of price adjustments (both upward and downward) increased suddenly,while the average magnitude of price changes fell;both,however,quickly settled back to the earlier patterns. Conversely,we do find evidence of a permanent decline in the persistence of inflation after the mid-1990s. While in principle this could be attributable to the preparation of EMU,this interpretation is put into question by the fact that a similar decline occurred also in the UK and in the US.
机译:令人惊讶地不是;或至少不是直接地。使用跨欧元引入前后数年的六个欧元区国家的个人消费者价格和部门通货膨胀率的数据,我们研究了EMU是否改变了价格制定者的行为和/或通货膨胀的动态。我们没有发现1999年以欧元作为电子记帐单位时发生这种变化的证据。在2002年初,当纸币出现时,价格调整的频率(向上和向下)突然增加,而平均价格变化幅度却下降了;但是,两者很快又回到了以前的模式。相反,我们确实找到了1990年代中期以后通货膨胀率持续下降的证据。虽然原则上这可以归因于EMU的准备,但由于英国和美国也出现了类似的下降,这一解释受到了质疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号