首页> 外文期刊>International journal of psychophysiology: official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology >Regulatory focus moderates the relationship between task control and physiological and psychological markers of stress: A work simulation study
【24h】

Regulatory focus moderates the relationship between task control and physiological and psychological markers of stress: A work simulation study

机译:监管重点缓解了任务控制与压力的生理和心理标记之间的关系:一项工作模拟研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This experiment examined whether trait regulatory focus moderates the effects of task control on stress reactions during a demanding work simulation. Regulatory focus describes two ways in which individuals self-regulate toward desired goals: promotion and prevention. As highly promotion-focused individuals are oriented toward growth and challenge, it was expected that they would show better adaptation to demanding work under high task control. In contrast, as highly prevention-focused individuals are oriented toward safety and responsibility they were expected to show better adaptation under low task control. Participants (N = 110) completed a measure of trait regulatory focus and then three trials of a demanding inbox activity under either low, neutral, or high task control. Heart rate variability (HRV), affective reactions (anxiety & task dissatisfaction), and task performance were measured at each trial. As predicted, highly promotion-focused individuals found high (compared to neutral) task control stress-buffering for performance. Moreover, highly prevention-focused individuals found high (compared to low) task control stress-exacerbating for dissatisfaction. In addition, highly prevention-focused individuals found low task control stress-buffering for dissatisfaction, performance, and HRV. However, these effects of low task control for highly prevention-focused individuals depended on their promotion focus. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:该实验检查了性格调节重点是否减轻了苛刻的工作模拟过程中任务控制对压力反应的影响。监管重点描述了个人朝着预期目标自我调节的两种方式:促进和预防。由于高度重视晋升的人面向成长和挑战,因此可以预期,他们将在高度任务控制下更好地适应要求苛刻的工作。相比之下,由于高度重视预防的人员注重安全性和责任感,因此他们期望在较低的任务控制下表现出更好的适应能力。参与者(N = 110)完成了对性状调控重点的测量,然后在低,中性或高任务控制下进行了一项要求严格的收件箱活动的三项试验。在每次试验中均测量了心率变异性(HRV),情感反应(焦虑和任务不满意)以及任务绩效。如预料的那样,高度重视晋升的人发现(相对于中立)任务控制压力缓冲能提高绩效。此外,高度重视预防的人发现(不满)任务控制压力高(不满意)。此外,高度重视预防的人员发现,由于不满,表现和HRV,任务控制压力缓冲较低。但是,对于高度关注预防的个人,低任务控制的这些效果取决于他们的晋升重点。官方版权(C)2014,Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号