首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Quality and Innovation >Demarcation: a dynamic methodology for quality grading within the Australian wine industry
【24h】

Demarcation: a dynamic methodology for quality grading within the Australian wine industry

机译:划分:澳大利亚葡萄酒行业内质量分级的动态方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Formal wine quality ranking has largely been a European phenomenon. While various publications and critics within new world wine industries conduct regular ranking exercises for wine taste or winery processes, these exercises usually target specific quality or taste elements, are often not particularly transparent, and are not comprehensive. In Australia, the lack of a comprehensive ranking system is not simply an oversight. Wine associations have directed the industry along very different pathways from those laid out by their more traditional European peers. There has been a much greater emphasis on the role of the winemaker and technological experimentation, and a more egalitarian, generic branding regime. Until very recently, little value has been placed on factors such as terroir, heritage, regional characteristics, or appropriate and specialised vineyard management. The author believes that the lack of a formalised and comprehensive quality ranking system for Australian wine is a deficiency that is now undermining the industry's reputation both at home and abroad. The following paper provides the context for, and justification of, what is proposed as a dynamic, transparent, and multi-category wine ranking matrix.
机译:正式的葡萄酒质量排名很大程度上是欧洲的现象。尽管新世界葡萄酒行业中的各种出版物和评论家定期对葡萄酒的口味或酿酒工艺进行排名练习,但这些练习通常针对特定的质量或口味元素,通常不是特别透明,也不全面。在澳大利亚,缺乏全面的排名系统不仅仅是监督。葡萄酒协会与传统的欧洲同行相比,引导行业发展的途径截然不同。酿酒师的作用和技术试验以及更加平等的,通用的品牌制度受到了更大的重视。直到最近,对风土,遗产,区域特征或适当而专业的葡萄园管理等因素的重视都很少。作者认为,缺乏针对澳大利亚葡萄酒的正规且全面的质量评级体系是一种缺陷,目前正在损害该行业在国内外的声誉。以下论文为动态,透明和多类别的葡萄酒排名矩阵的提出提供了背景和依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号