...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of rehabilitation research: Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschungon >Comparison of the ICF core set for cardiopulmonary conditions in the acute hospital setting among different types of transplant patients
【24h】

Comparison of the ICF core set for cardiopulmonary conditions in the acute hospital setting among different types of transplant patients

机译:不同类型移植患者在急性医院环境中用于心肺疾病的ICF核心集的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To compare the functioning profiles of patients receiving different types of organ transplants using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. The patients (n = 102) were enrolled between days 5 and 10 after discharge following receipt of an organ transplant, and assessed for sociodemographic variables, the Functional Independence Measure and Barthel Index, and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health core set for cardiopulmonary conditions in the acute hospital, augmented with three additional categories. Analysis was conducted by grouping the patients as follows: (1) kidney transplants; (2) all other kinds of transplants. Functional Independence Measure/Barthel Index scores were significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2. Prevalences of 30% or greater for any impairment were noted for seven b factors, one s factor, and one d factor in group 1, whereas the corresponding numbers for group 2 were 14, 2, and 8, respectively. When prevalences of 30% or greater were calculated for severe or total impairment for all factors, there were none for group 1, but six factors for group 2. For the six factors, the prevalence difference between the groups was significant in five after a full Bonferroni correction (P < 0.000002). The e factors with the highest barriers were e110 (products or substances for personal consumption, 36%) and e120 (products and technology for personal use in daily living, 42%) in group 2 (both significant with P < 0.000001 when compared with the respective prevalences in group 1). Although exercise seems to be the most needed rehabilitation function for kidney transplant patients, other transplant patients will require considerably more rehabilitation intervention.
机译:使用国际功能,残疾和健康分类标准,比较接受不同类型器官移植的患者的功能概况。患者(n = 102)在接受器官移植后出院后第5天至第10天入组,并评估了社会人口统计学变量,功能独立性量度和Barthel指数以及国际功能,残疾和健康分类标准在急诊医院心肺疾病方面,增加了三个附加类别。通过将患者分组如下进行分析:(1)肾脏移植; (2)所有其他种类的移植。第1组的功能独立性测量/ Barthel指数得分明显高于第2组。第1组中的7个b因子,1 s因子和1 d因子的任何障碍患病率均在30%或更高。第2组的分别是14、2和8。当计算出所有因素的严重或完全损伤的患病率在30%或更高时,第1组没有患病,而第2组有6个患病因素。对于这6个因素,在整整一个疗程后,有5个患病组的患病率差异显着Bonferroni校正(P <0.000002)。第2组中障碍最大的e因子是e110(个人消费产品或物质,占36%)和e120(日常生活中使用的产品和技术,占42%)(与P2相比,P <0.000001均显着)第1组的患病率)。尽管运动似乎是肾移植患者最需要的康复功能,但其他移植患者将需要更多的康复干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号