...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Bone density and geometry in assessing hip fracture risk in post-menopausal women.
【24h】

Bone density and geometry in assessing hip fracture risk in post-menopausal women.

机译:评估绝经后妇女髋部骨折风险的骨密度和几何形状。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We used femoral neck structural parameters (FNSPs), calculated from bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the femoral neck by dual X-ray absorptiometry, to discriminate osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur in post-menopausal women. We compared 1646 women without fracture and 429 women with hip fractures, including 273 with femoral neck (FN) and 156 with trochanter (TR) fractures. The association between the studied parameters and the fractures was modelled using multiple logistic regression, and included age, height and weight. Fracture-predicted probability (FPP) was also calculated for each predictor tested. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas with their standard errors (SEs) were calculated for the fracture status, having the calculated FPP as a test variable. The areas were compared by the Hanley-McNeil test. Hip fracture had lower BMD, cross-sectional area (CSA), section modulus (SM) and cortical thickness (CT), and higher buckling ratio (BR), than controls. To the same extent as FN BMD, BR best predicted the risk for each fracture, showing ROC curve areas of 0.809 (SE 0.011) for hip fracture, 0.789 (SE 0.014) for FN fracture, and 0.848 (SE 0.016) for TR fracture. The association of BR with fracture risk did not differ from that of FN BMD, which has a ROC curve area of 0.801 (SE 0.011) for hip fracture, 0.778 (SE 0.014) for FN fracture, and 0.852 (SE 0.016) for TR fracture. Both FN BMD and BR predicted TR fracture significantly better than they did FN fracture. FNSPs, although interesting in understanding the biomechanics of bone fragility, do not appear to add diagnostic value to the simple measurement of BMD.
机译:我们使用股骨颈结构参数(FNSPs)来计算绝经后妇女股骨近端的骨质疏松性骨折,该参数是通过双X线吸收法从股骨颈的骨矿物质密度(BMD)测量得出的。我们比较了1646例未骨折的妇女和429例髋部骨折的妇女,包括273例股骨颈(FN)和156例股骨转子(TR)骨折。使用多元逻辑回归模型对研究参数与骨折之间的关联进行建模,其中包括年龄,身高和体重。还为每个测试的预测变量计算了骨折预测概率(FPP)。计算接收器的工作特性(ROC)曲线区域及其标准误差(SEs)的断裂状态,并将计算出的FPP作为测试变量。通过Hanley-McNeil检验比较面积。髋部骨折的BMD,横截面积(CSA),截面模量(SM)和皮质厚度(CT)均比对照组低,而屈曲率(BR)则更高。在与FN BMD相同的程度上,BR可以最佳地预测每次骨折的风险,髋关节骨折的ROC曲线面积为0.809(SE 0.011),FN骨折的ROC曲线面积为0.789(SE 0.014),TR骨折为0.848(SE 0.016)。 BR与骨折风险的相关性与FN BMD的相关性无异,髋关节骨折的ROC曲线面积为0.801(SE 0.011),FN骨折的ROC曲线面积为0.778(SE 0.014),TR骨折的ROC曲线面积为0.852(SE 0.016)。 。 FN BMD和BR预测的TR断裂均明显优于FN断裂。 FNSP尽管对了解骨脆性的生物力学很感兴趣,但似乎并没有为BMD的简单测量增加诊断价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号