首页> 外文期刊>International journal of computerized dentistry >Retentive strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
【24h】

Retentive strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.

机译:整体式全瓷冠在种植体基台上的保持力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to determine the retentive strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns cemented on titanium implant abutments. 225 crowns (75 crowns each of Mark II, Empress CAD, and e.max CAD) were milled using a CAD/ CAM system. The crowns were cemented onto sandblasted titanium implant abutments using five luting agents (Multilink Implant, Variolink II, RelyX Unicem, Fujicem, and Panavia 2.0). After thermocycling, the crowns were removed using a universal testing machine. The location of luting agent residue on the abutment and inner crown surfaces was evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction. In comparing the luting agents, no significant difference was found between Vita Mark II and Empress CAD. For e.max CAD, the luting agent RelyX Unicem had a significantly higher mean retentive strength than did Multilink Implant (p = 0.003) or Panavia 2.0 (p = 0.001). In comparing the ceramic materials, e.max CAD showed significantly higher pull-off strengths than the other two ceramic materials when the luting agents RelyX Unicem and Fujicem were used (all p < 0.001). The residues of nearly all luting agents were located entirely or almost entirely (75%-100%) on the inner crown surfaces of all ceramic materials, except for the luting agent GC Fujicem, which left more luting agent residue (0%-75%) on the abutment surfaces of all ceramic materials. In comparing the five luting agents, significant differences in the resulting retentive strength were only found for the ceramic material e.max CAD. The other ceramic materials did not show significant differences in retentive strength, independent of the luting agent.
机译:该研究的目的是确定粘结在钛种植体基台上的整体式全瓷冠的固位强度。使用CAD / CAM系统研磨了225冠(Mark II,Empress CAD和e.max CAD分别为75冠)。使用五种浸润剂(Multilink植入物,Variolink II,RelyX Unicem,Fujicem和Panavia 2.0)将牙冠粘合到喷砂的钛植入物基台上。热循环后,使用万能试验机去除牙冠。评估了基台和内冠表面上的助剂残渣的位置。使用具有Bonferroni校正的ANOVA进行统计分析。在比较助剂时,在Vita Mark II和Empress CAD之间没有发现显着差异。对于e.max CAD,诱剂RelyX Unicem的平均保持强度比Multilink Implant(p = 0.003)或Panavia 2.0(p = 0.001)高得多。在比较陶瓷材料时,当使用助粘剂RelyX Unicem和Fujicem时,e.max CAD显示出比其他两种陶瓷材料显着更高的剥离强度(所有p <0.001)。几乎所有诱变剂的残留物全部或几乎全部(75%-100%)位于所有陶瓷材料的内胎冠表面上,除了诱变剂GC Fujicem留下的残留量更多(0%-75%) )在所有陶瓷材料的基台表面上。在比较这五种浸润剂时,仅在陶瓷材料e.max CAD中发现了所保持力的显着差异。其他陶瓷材料的保持强度没有显着差异,而与助粘剂无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号