首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics >Bioequivalence study of two commercial amoxicillin suspension formulations in healthy human volunteers
【24h】

Bioequivalence study of two commercial amoxicillin suspension formulations in healthy human volunteers

机译:两种市售阿莫西林悬浮液制剂在健康人类志愿者中的生物等效性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the pharmacokinetic profiles and to evaluate the bioequivalence of two commercial amoxicillin suspension formulations (500 mg/5 mL AMOXIL?, reference formulation and AMOXI-PED?, test formulation) in healthy Brazilian volunteers. Methods: Under fasting condition, 25 volunteers (13 males and 12 females) were included in this randomized, open-label, two-period crossover (1-week washout interval) bioequivalence study. Blood samples were collected at pre-dose (0 hour) and 0.5, 1, 1.33, 1.66, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after drug ingestion. Pharmacokinetic parameters (C max, tmax, t1/2, AUC0-tlast, and AUC0-∞) were calculated from plasma concentrations for both formulations in each subject. Results: Arithmetic mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters were: Cmax = 12.004 (± 2.824) μg×mL-1; tmax = 1.118 (± 0.396) h; t 1/2 = 1.226 (± 0.179) h; AUC0-tlast = 29.297 (± 6.007) μg×h×mL-1; and AUC 0-∞ = 29.299 (± 6.007) μg×h×mL -1 for reference formulation and Cmax = 11.456 (± 2.825) μg×mL-1; tmax = 1.331 (± 0.509) h; t1/2 = 1.141 (± 0.133) h; AUC0-tlast = 28.672 (± 5.778) μg×h×mL-1; and AUC 0-∞ = 28.693 (± 5.796) μg×h×mL -1 for test formulation. The confidence intervals (90% CI) for reference and test formulations were, respectively, 90.74-100.46% for C max and 93.62-103.61% for AUC0-t. Conclusion: Based on the results, both formulations of amoxicillin evaluated in this study were considered bioequivalent according to FDA and ANVISA/Brazil criteria.
机译:目的:在健康的巴西志愿者中比较两种市售阿莫西林悬浮液制剂(500 mg / 5 mL AMOXIL ?,参考制剂和AMOXI-PED ?,测试制剂)的药代动力学特征和生物等效性。方法:在禁食的条件下,该随机,开放标签,两期交叉(1周洗脱间隔)生物等效性研究包括25名志愿者(13名男性和12名女性)。服药前(0小时)和摄入药物后0.5、1、1.33、1.66、2、2.5、3、4、6、8和12小时收集血液样本。从每个受试者中两种制剂的血浆浓度计算出药代动力学参数(C max,tmax,t1 / 2,AUC0-tlast和AUC0-∞)。结果:药代动力学参数的算术平均值为:Cmax = 12.004(±2.824)μg×mL-1; tmax = 1.118(±0.396)小时; t 1/2 = 1.226(±0.179)h; AUC0-tlast = 29.297(±6.007)μg×h×mL-1;参考制剂的AUC0-∞= 29.299(±6.007)μg×h×mL -1,Cmax = 11.456(±2.825)μg×mL-1; tmax = 1.331(±0.509)小时; t1 / 2 = 1.141(±0.133)h; AUC0-tlast = 28.672(±5.778)μg×h×mL-1;对于测试制剂,AUC0-∞= 28.693(±5.796)μg×h×mL -1。参考配方和测试配方的置信区间(90%CI)分别为C max和AUC0-t分别为90.74-100.46%和93.62-103.61%。结论:根据结果,根据FDA和ANVISA /巴西标准,在本研究中评估的两种阿莫西林制剂均被视为生物等效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号