...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of clinical pharmacology >Lack of pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between generic and branded amoxicillin formulations. A post-marketing clinical study on healthy volunteers
【24h】

Lack of pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between generic and branded amoxicillin formulations. A post-marketing clinical study on healthy volunteers

机译:通用和品牌阿莫西林制剂之间缺乏药代动力学生物等效性。健康志愿者的上市后临床研究

获取原文
           

摘要

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT ? Generic medicinal products are 'copies' of patented drugs and can be marketed at low cost following patent expiration of the brand-name preparations. ? Although the development of generic medicinal products is regulated by specific guidelines, a number of issues and concerns continue to undermine the confidence of physicians and patients in generic drugs. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS ? The present findings open interesting perspectives for the discussion of the quality of generic drugs in the postmarketing setting. ? In particular, our trial shows that postmarketing evaluation of bioequivalence between branded amoxicillin and its generic copies might result in lack of interchangeability. AIMS There are concerns about the quality of generic drugs in the postmarketing setting. The aim was to establish whether two generic formulations of amoxicillin, available on the Italian market, fulfil the criteria for clinical pharmacokinetic bioequivalence vs. the branded drug. METHODS Two generic amoxicillin products (generic A and B) were selected among four fast-release tablet formulations available on the Italian market. Twenty-four healthy adult volunteers of either sex participated to a single-dose, randomized, three-treatment, crossover, single-blind bioequivalence study designed to compare generic A and B with branded amoxicillin. Plasma samples were collected at preset times for 24 h after dosing, and assayed for amoxicillin levels by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS Ninety percent confidence intervals of AUC ratios were 0.8238, 1.0502 (ratio 0.9302) and 0.8116, 1.1007 (ratio 0.9452) for generic A and B vs. branded amoxicillin, respectively. Ninety percent confidence intervals of C max ratios were 0.7921, 1.0134 (ratio 0.8960) and 0.8246, 1.1199 (ratio 0.9610) for generic A and B vs. branded amoxicillin, respectively. The mean pharmacokinetic profiles showed that the AUC value of branded amoxicillin was 8.5 and 5.4% greater than that estimated for generic A and B, respectively. Few adverse events were recorded; these were not serious and occurred without apparent relationship to any specific amoxicillin formulation. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that one of the two marketed amoxicillin generics analysed in the present study is not bioequivalent to the brand leader product for C max on the basis of single-dose pharmacokinetic assessment.
机译:此主题已经知道什么?通用药品是专利药品的“副本”,可以在品牌制剂的专利到期后以低成本出售。 ?尽管非专利药品的开发受到特定准则的约束,但许多问题和担忧继续损害医师和患者对非专利药品的信心。该研究可增加哪些内容?本研究结果为上市后环境中仿制药质量的讨论提供了有趣的观点。 ?特别是,我们的试验表明,上市后对品牌阿莫西林及其仿制药之间生物等效性的评估可能会导致缺乏互换性。目标在上市后的环境中,仿制药的质量令人担忧。目的是确定在意大利市场上可获得的两种阿莫西林通用制剂相对于品牌药物而言是否满足临床药代动力学生物等效性的标准。方法从意大利市场上可获得的四种速释片剂中选择了两种通用的阿莫西林产品(通用A和B)。二十四名健康的成人男女志愿者参加了一项单剂量,随机,三项治疗,交叉,单盲生物等效性研究,旨在比较仿制药A和B与品牌的阿莫西林。给药后24小时在预设时间收集血浆样品,并通过高效液相色谱法测定阿莫西林水平。结果仿制药A和B与品牌阿莫西林相比,AUC比率的90%置信区间分别为0.8238、1.0502(比率0.9302)和0.8116、1.1007(比率0.9452)。与品牌的阿莫西林相比,仿制药A和B的C max 比的90%置信区间分别为0.7921、1.0134(比率0.8960)和0.8246、1.1199(比率0.9610)。平均药代动力学特征表明,烙印的阿莫西林的AUC值分别比仿制药A和B估计的AUC值高8.5和5.4%。几乎没有不良事件的记录;这些症状并不严重,且与任何特定的阿莫西林制剂均无明显关系。结论这些结果表明,在单剂量药代动力学评估的基础上,本研究中分析的两种市售阿莫西林仿制药之一与C max 的品牌领导产品并不具有生物等效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号