...
首页> 外文期刊>International clinical psychopharmacology >Newer antidepressants and panic disorder: A meta-analysis
【24h】

Newer antidepressants and panic disorder: A meta-analysis

机译:新型抗抑郁药和恐慌症的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine are currently considered as first-line agents for patients with panic disorder (PD). However, a systematic comparison of newer antidepressants for the treatment of PD is lacking thus far. Eligible studies focusing on PD patients treated with newer antidepressants were entered in the Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager. Our primary outcome measure was the mean change in panic symptoms from the baseline to the endpoint in patients treated with antidepressants as compared with those treated with placebo. Secondary outcome measures included the mean change in the overall anxiety scores and dropout rates. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out. Fifty studies focusing on 5236 patients were included. The following antidepressants were significantly superior to placebo for PD patients with the following increasing order of effectiveness: citalopram, sertraline, paroxetine, fluoxetine, and venlafaxine for panic symptoms and paroxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, citalopram, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine for overall anxiety symptoms. Aside from reboxetine and fluvoxamine, all drugs were associated with significantly lower dropout rates as compared with placebo. Several clinical variables moderated clinical outcomes. However, because of some inconsistencies across the studies and limited evidence for some drugs under investigation, further head-to-head comparisons are required.
机译:选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和文拉法辛目前被认为是恐慌症(PD)患者的一线药物。然而,到目前为止,尚缺乏对新型抗抑郁药治疗PD的系统比较。在Cochrane协作审查经理中,进行了针对以新型抗抑郁药治疗的PD患者的合格研究。我们的主要结局指标是接受抗抑郁药治疗的患者与接受安慰剂治疗的患者从基线到终点的恐慌症状的平均变化。次要结局指标包括总体焦虑评分和辍学率的平均变化。还进行了敏感性分析。纳入了针对5236名患者的50项研究。对于PD患者,以下抗抑郁药明显优于安慰剂,其有效性依次递增:西酞普兰,舍曲林,帕罗西汀,氟西汀和文拉法辛治疗惊恐症状,帕罗西汀,氟西汀,氟伏沙明,西酞普兰,文拉法辛和米氮平治疗总体焦虑症。除瑞波西汀和氟伏沙明外,与安慰剂相比,所有药物的辍学率均显着降低。几种临床变量可减轻临床结果。但是,由于研究之间存在某些不一致之处,并且某些被调查药物的证据有限,因此需要进行进一步的头对头比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号