...
首页> 外文期刊>Intelligent enterprise >BUSINESS MAKES THE RULES: VENDORS PROMISE TO PUT BUSINESS STAFF IN CHARGE OF RULES, BUT DO YOU REALLY WANT USERS MESSING WITH MISSION-CRITICAL APPS? HERE'S HOW FOUR FIRMS ARE BALANCING RESPONSIBILITIES FOR RULES
【24h】

BUSINESS MAKES THE RULES: VENDORS PROMISE TO PUT BUSINESS STAFF IN CHARGE OF RULES, BUT DO YOU REALLY WANT USERS MESSING WITH MISSION-CRITICAL APPS? HERE'S HOW FOUR FIRMS ARE BALANCING RESPONSIBILITIES FOR RULES

机译:企业制定规则:供应商承诺按规则收取业务人员,但是您真的希望用户使用关键任务应用程序吗?这里的四家公司对规则负有责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concepts underlying business rules aren't new. If-then-else logic has been at the heart of computer processing since the first program was written, and the expert systems and artificial intelligence of the late 1990s are progenitors of today's business rules management systems (BRMSs). Despite the evolutionary connection, today's rales technology is remarkably different from yesterday's systems. Nowhere is that difference more marked than in the ability of business staff to control rules that can potentially affect processes, workflows and even mission-critical systems.
机译:业务规则的基础概念并不是新概念。自编写第一个程序以来,If-then-else逻辑一直是计算机处理的核心,而1990年代后期的专家系统和人工智能是当今业务规则管理系统(BRMS)的前身。尽管存在进化联系,但今天的罗尔斯技术与昨天的系统明显不同。这种差异最明显的地方在于业务人员控制可能影响流程,工作流甚至关键任务系统的规则的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号