...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Distal forearm fracture in the adult: is ORIF of the radius and closed reduction of the ulna a treatment option in distal forearm fracture?
【24h】

Distal forearm fracture in the adult: is ORIF of the radius and closed reduction of the ulna a treatment option in distal forearm fracture?

机译:成人前臂远端骨折:OR骨的ORIF和尺骨闭合复位是远端前臂骨折的治疗选择吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Distal forearm fractures in younger adults are rare injuries resulting from high energy trauma. Treatment options vary from cast fixation, external fixator, percutaneus pinning and open reduction and internal fixation. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed 13 patients aged 18-59 from 1996 to 2005 with a distal unstable forearm fracture. All were treated with open reduction and internal fixation of the radius. The ulna was stabilized either by an open reduction and internal fixation or by a closed reduction with or without pin fixation and cast fixation in all cases. At follow-up, we evaluated the radiologic results in terms of forearm fracture retention and functional outcome according to the wrist score by Krimmer. RESULT: Radial inclination amounted to 24 degrees at the injured side when compared to 27 degrees at the non-injured side, palmar tilt was 3 degrees versus 7 degrees and ulna variance was -2 versus -1 mm. According to the modified wrist score by Krimmer, seven excellent, two good and four fair results were achieved. The range of motion of the injured wrist joint was 149 degrees of rotation, in the sagittal plane 106 degrees , frontal plane 61 degrees and on the non-injured side rotation was 171 degrees , and movement in the sagittal plane was 146 degrees and 79 degrees in the frontal plane. Decreased forearm rotation (107 degrees vs. 162 degrees ) and decreased range of motion in the sagittal plane (77 degrees vs. 114 degrees ) were measured in patient following open reduction and internal fixation of radius and ulna compared to the outcome in patients with open reduction and internal fixation of the radius and closed reduction of the ulna. Grip strength of the injured side averaged 350 N versus 440 N which is 76% of that of the opposite side. All patients stated no pain at rest and some experienced slight pain at work. Three patients had an excellent performance at daily activities, nine patients presented problems with certain activities, and one patient showed severe limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction and internal fixation of the radius is the keystone in treating distal forearm fracture. In case of stable retention of the ulnar head after closed reduction, cast fixation with or without percutaneus pin fixation is a sufficient method to treat unstable distal forearm fractures. In patients with remaining instability of the distal ulna fracture, ORIF is indicated.
机译:简介:年轻人的前臂远端骨折是由高能量创伤导致的罕见伤害。治疗选择包括石膏固定,外部固定器,经皮钉扎,切开复位和内部固定。方法:我们回顾性分析了1996年至2005年间13例年龄在18-59岁的远端前臂不稳定骨折的患者。所有患者均接受切开复位and骨内固定治疗。在所有情况下,通过开放复位和内固定或通过闭合复位(有或没有销钉固定和石膏固定)来稳定尺骨。在随访中,我们根据Krimmer的手腕评分评估了前臂骨折保留和功能预后方面的放射学结果。结果:受伤侧the骨倾斜度为24度,而未受伤侧27骨倾斜度为27度,手掌倾斜度为3度对7度,尺骨方差为-2对-1 mm。根据Krimmer修改后的手腕得分,获得了7项优秀,2项良好和4项公平的结果。受伤的腕关节的运动范围为149度,矢状面为106度,额面为61度,非受伤侧为171度,矢状面为146度和79度。在额面。与开放性患者相比,开放性复位及and骨和尺骨内固定术后患者的前臂旋转减少(107度vs. 162度)和矢状面运动范围减小(77度vs. 114度)。骨的复位和内固定,尺骨的闭合复位。受伤侧的握力平均为350 N,而平均为440 N,是另一侧的握力的76%。所有患者在休息时均无疼痛,有些患者在工作时出现轻度疼痛。 3名患者在日常活动中表现出色,9名患者出现某些活动问题,1名患者表现出严重的局限性。结论:切开复位and骨内固定是治疗前臂远端骨折的关键。在闭合复位后稳定尺骨head的情况下,采用或不采用经皮穿刺针固定术进行石膏固定是治疗不稳定的前臂远端骨折的足够方法。对于尺骨远端骨折仍不稳定的患者,应使用ORIF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号