...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition >Pain in neonates during screening for retinopathy of prematurity using binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and wide-field digital retinal imaging: A randomised comparison
【24h】

Pain in neonates during screening for retinopathy of prematurity using binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and wide-field digital retinal imaging: A randomised comparison

机译:双眼间接检眼镜和宽视野数字视网膜成像筛查早产儿视网膜病变期间的疼痛:随机比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the pain experienced by premature infants undergoing wide-field digital retinal imaging (WFDRI) and binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening. Methods: Infants were recruited at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary Neonatal Unit, Edinburgh, UK. Eyes were examined by WFDRI and BIO with eyelid speculum by two experienced paediatric ophthalmologists in random order. A pain score (Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP)) for WFDRI and BIO was generated. Results: A total of 76 infants were recruited. The (mean, SD) PIPP score for WFDRI was 15.0, 2.1 and for BIO was 15.2, 2.4 (paired t test p=0.47). The authors observed that infants started crying with corresponding physiological changes as soon as the eyelid speculum was inserted and crying stopped on speculum removal. Conclusion: WFDRI and BIO with eyelid speculum are similarly painful for infants. The authors speculate that the eyelid speculum rather than the examination method may contribute most to the pain experienced.
机译:目的:比较早产儿经历广域数字视网膜成像(WFDRI)和双眼间接检眼镜(BIO)筛查早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)时所经历的疼痛。方法:婴儿在英国爱丁堡爱丁堡皇家医院新生儿室招募。两名经验丰富的儿科眼科医生以随机顺序通过WFDRI和BIO进行眼睑窥镜检查。生成了WFDRI和BIO的疼痛评分(婴儿早期疼痛档案(PIPP))。结果:共纳入76名婴儿。 WFDRI的(均值,SD)PIPP得分为15.0、2.1,BIO的PIPP得分为15.2、2.4(配对t检验p = 0.47)。作者观察到,一旦插入眼睑窥镜,婴儿便开始哭闹并伴随相应的生理变化,而在摘除窥镜时哭声停止了。结论:WFDRI和BIO联合眼睑窥镜对婴儿同样有痛苦。作者推测,眼睑镜而不是检查方法可能是造成疼痛的主要原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号