首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >Investigating the efficacy of practical skill teaching: A pilot-study comparing three educational methods
【24h】

Investigating the efficacy of practical skill teaching: A pilot-study comparing three educational methods

机译:研究实践技能教学的有效性:比较三种教学方法的试点研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Effective education of practical skills can alter clinician behaviour, positively influence patient outcomes, and reduce the risk of patient harm. This study compares the efficacy of two innovative practical skill teaching methods, against a traditional teaching method. Year three pre-clinical physiotherapy students consented to participate in a randomised controlled trial, with concealed allocation and blinded participants and outcome assessment. Each of the three randomly allocated groups were exposed to a different practical skills teaching method (traditional, pre-recorded video tutorial or student self-video) for two specific practical skills during the semester. Clinical performance was assessed using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). The students were also administered a questionnaire to gain the participants level of satisfaction with the teaching method, and their perceptions of the teaching methods educational value. There were no significant differences in clinical performance between the three practical skill teaching methods as measured in the OSCE, or for student ratings of satisfaction. A significant difference existed between the methods for the student ratings of perceived educational value, with the teaching approaches of pre-recorded video tutorial and student self-video being rated higher than 'traditional' live tutoring. Alternative teaching methods to traditional live tutoring can produce equivalent learning outcomes when applied to the practical skill development of undergraduate health professional students. The use of alternative practical skill teaching methods may allow for greater flexibility for both staff and infrastructure resource allocation. ? 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
机译:有效的实践技能教育可以改变临床医生的行为,对患者的结局产生积极影响,并降低患者遭受伤害的风险。这项研究比较了两种创新的实践技能教学方法与传统教学方法的效果。第三年临床前理疗课程的学生同意参加一项随机对照试验,并进行隐蔽分配,不知情参与者和结果评估。三个随机分配的小组中的每一个小组在学期中都接受了针对两种特定实践技能的不同实践技能教学方法(传统的预先录制的视频教程或学生自学视频)。使用客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)评估临床表现。还对学生进行了问卷调查,以提高参与者对教学方法的满意度,以及他们对教学方法教育价值的认识。在OSCE中测得的三种实践技能教学方法之间或在对学生的满意度方面,临床表现没有显着差异。学生对感知的教育价值进行评分的方法之间存在显着差异,预先录制的视频教程和学生自学视频的教学方法的评分高于“传统”实时辅导。当将传统的现场辅导的替代教学方法应用于健康专业本科生的实践技能开发时,可以产生同等的学习效果。使用替代的实践技能教学方法可以为人员和基础设施资源分配提供更大的灵活性。 ? 2012年Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号