...
首页> 外文期刊>Aging clinical and experimental research >The influence of chair seat height on the performance of community-dwelling older adults' 30-second chair stand test
【24h】

The influence of chair seat height on the performance of community-dwelling older adults' 30-second chair stand test

机译:座椅高度对社区居民老年人30秒座椅站立测试性能的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and aims: Although chair seat height affects the performance of sit-to-stand movement, no previous study has examined the influence of chair seat height on the 30-second chair stand test (CST). Methods: Fifty-five community-dwelling older adults (age 70.0 ± 6.3 years) performed the test from the standard height of 43 cm and then from five randomly ordered seat heights from 80 to 120 % of each participant's lower leg length. Results: Chair seat height significantly influences the performance of community-dwelling older adults' 30-s CST (F = 57.50, p < 0.001). The mean score for standard conditions was significantly lower from those at 120, 110, and 100 % conditions (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the standard and 80 % conditions (p > 0.95) and between the standard and 90 % conditions (p = 0.353). When comparing the scores between the randomly ordered chair seat heights, all comparisons were significantly different (p < 0.001) except for the difference between the 120 and 110 % conditions (p = 0.104). Conclusion: Chair seat height's relation to the lower leg length should be considered when interpreting 30-s CST scores. Additionally, it is necessary to optimize the chair seat height when using the 30-s CST as an outcome measure for exercise intervention or to screen for people with weaker lower extremities.
机译:背景和目的:尽管椅子的座高会影响坐着站立运动的性能,但以前的研究都没有研究过椅子的座高对30秒椅子站立测试(CST)的影响。方法:55位社区居住的老年人(年龄70.0±6.3岁)从43厘米的标准身高进行测试,然后从五个随机排序的座椅高度进行测试,这些高度分别为每位参与者小腿长度的80%至120%。结果:椅子座椅高度显着影响居住在社区的老年人的30-s CST的表现(F = 57.50,p <0.001)。标准条件下的平均得分明显低于120%,110%和100%条件下的得分(p <0.05)。在标准和80%的条件下(p> 0.95)和在标准和90%的条件下(p = 0.353)没有观察到显着差异。当比较随机排序的椅子座椅高度之间的得分时,除120%和110%条件之间的差异(p = 0.104)外,所有比较均显着不同(p <0.001)。结论:解释30-s CST分数时,应考虑椅子座椅高度与小腿长度的关系。另外,在使用30秒CST作为运动干预的结果指标或筛查下肢较弱的人时,有必要优化椅子的座椅高度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号