...
首页> 外文期刊>Allergy and asthma proceedings >Comparison of serum-specific IgE (ImmunoCAP) and skin-prick test results for 53 inhalant allergens in patients with chronic rhinitis.
【24h】

Comparison of serum-specific IgE (ImmunoCAP) and skin-prick test results for 53 inhalant allergens in patients with chronic rhinitis.

机译:慢性鼻炎患者的53种吸入性过敏原的血清特异性IgE(ImmunoCAP)和皮肤点刺试验结果的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prior studies comparing skin testing to serum-specific IgE testing for inhalant allergy focused on older technologies or small numbers of allergens. The purpose of this study was to compare ImmunoCAP (CAP) testing to skin prick testing (ST) for 53 inhalant allergens. Subjects > or =18 years old with chronic rhinitis and who had at least 1 positive ST to a 53 inhalant allergen panel underwent testing to an analogous CAP panel. ST was performed with the Quintip device. Using ST as a clinical gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for CAP for each allergen. Percent agreement between testing methods was also evaluated, and the results were analyzed in association with the subjects' total IgE levels. Two-hundred fifty patients (96 male, 154 female, mean 37.1 years) were enrolled. Mean number of positive ST and CAP results were similar. The ST was more often positive for 69.8% of allergens, and 64% of patients had more positive ST than CAP. Overall, the specificity and NPV (generally 80-90%) of CAP were higher than the sensitivity and PPV. The overall agreement between tests was 80.6%, with 11.7% ST+CAP- results and 7.7% CAP+ST- results. In patients with a total IgE level > or = 200 IU/L, the percentage of positive CAP results for 52/53 allergens was significantly higher with more CAP+ST- results. The performance characteristics of CAP compared to ST vary among 53 inhalant allergens. CAP should be considered complementary, not equivalent, to ST. Total IgE levels should be obtained with serum-specific IgE testing.
机译:先前的研究将皮肤测试与针对吸入性过敏的血清特异性IgE测试进行了比较,重点是较老的技术或少量的过敏原。这项研究的目的是比较53种吸入性过敏原的ImmunoCAP(CAP)测试与皮肤点刺测试(ST)。 ≥18岁的慢性鼻炎患者,至少53吸入性过敏原组的ST阳性,接受了与CAP相似的试验。 ST用Quintip设备执行。使用ST作为临床金标准,计算每种过敏原的CAP的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值(PPV,NPV)。还评估了测试方法之间的一致性百分比,并结合受试者的总IgE水平分析了结果。入选了250名患者(男96例,女154例,平均37.1岁)。 ST和CAP阳性结果的平均数相似。 ST占过敏原的69.8%更为常见,并且64%的患者ST阳性比CAP高。总体而言,CAP的特异性和NPV(通常为80-90%)高于敏感性和PPV。测试之间的总体一致性为80.6%,ST + CAP-结果为11.7%,CAP + ST-结果为7.7%。在总IgE水平>或= 200 IU / L的患者中,具有更多CAP + ST-结果的52/53过敏原阳性CAP结果百分比显着更高。与ST相比,CAP的性能特征在53种吸入性过敏原中有所不同。 CAP应该被认为是ST的补充,而不是等同。总IgE水平应通过血清特异性IgE测试获得。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号