首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to laboratory animals: ATLA >Ethical review of projects involving non-human primates funded under the European Union's 7th Research Framework Programme
【24h】

Ethical review of projects involving non-human primates funded under the European Union's 7th Research Framework Programme

机译:对由欧盟第七研究框架计划资助的涉及非人类灵长类动物的项目的伦理审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Internet searches were performed on projects involving non-human primates ('primates') funded under the European Union (EU) 7th Research Framework Programme (FP7), to determine how project proposals are assessed from an ethical point of view. Due to the incompleteness of the information publicly available, the types and severity of the experiments could not be determined with certainty, although in some projects the level of harm was considered to be 'severe'. Information was scarce regarding the numbers of primates, their sourcing, housing, care and fate, or the application of the Three Rs within projects. Project grant holders and the relevant Commission officer were consulted about their experiences with the FP7 ethics review process. Overall, it was seen as meaningful and beneficial, but some concerns were also noted. Ethical follow-up during project performance and upon completion was recognised as a valuable tool in ensuring that animal welfare requirements were adequately addressed. Based upon the outcome of the survey, recommendations are presented on how to strengthen the ethical review process under the upcoming Framework Programme 'Horizon 2020', while adequately taking into account the specific requirements of Directive 2010/63/EU, with the aim of limiting the harms inflicted on the animals and the numbers used, and ultimately, replacing the use of primates altogether.
机译:对由欧盟(EU)第七研究框架计划(FP7)资助的涉及非人类灵长类动物(“灵长类动物”)的项目进行了Internet搜索,以确定从道德角度评估项目建议的方式。由于公开信息的不完整,尽管某些项目中的危害程度被认为是“严重”的,但无法确定实验的类型和严重性。关于灵长类动物的数量,它们的来源,住房,照料和命运或项目中“三个R”的应用,信息很少。向项目赠款持有人和相关的委员会官员咨询了他们在FP7道德审查流程中的经验。总体而言,它被认为是有意义和有益的,但也有人指出了一些担忧。在项目执行过程中和完成时进行道德跟进被认为是确保适当满足动物福利要求的宝贵工具。根据调查结果,提出了有关如何在即将到来的框架计划“ Horizo​​n 2020”下加强道德审查流程的建议,同时充分考虑了指令2010/63 / EU的具体要求,目的是限制对动物的危害和所用动物的数量,最终完全取代了使用灵长类动物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号