...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of proteome research >A Comparison of Common Mass Spectrometry Approaches for Paleoproteomics
【24h】

A Comparison of Common Mass Spectrometry Approaches for Paleoproteomics

机译:古蛋白质组的常见质谱方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The last two decades have seen a broad diversity of methods used to identify and/or characterize proteins in the archeological and paleontological record. Of these, mass spectrometry has opened an unprecedented window into the proteomes of the past, providing protein sequence data from long extinct animals as well as historical and prehistorical artifacts. Thus, application of mass spectrometry to fossil remains has become an attractive source for ancient molecular sequences with which to conduct evolutionary studies, particularly in specimens older than the proposed limit of amplifiable DNA detection. However, “mass spectrometry” covers a range of mass-based proteomic approaches, each of which utilize different technology and physical principles to generate unique types of data, with their own strengths and challenges. Here, we discuss a variety of mass spectrometry techniques that have or may be used to detect and characterize archeological and paleontological proteins, with a particular focus on MALDI-MS, LC–MS/MS, TOF-SIMS, and MSi. The main differences in their functionality, the types of data they produce, and the potential effects of diagenesis on their results are considered.
机译:过去二十年来看过具有用于鉴定和/或表征考古学和古生物学记录中蛋白质的广泛多样化的方法。其中,质谱仪已将前所未有的窗口打开到过去的蛋白质组中,提供来自长期灭绝动物的蛋白质序列数据以及历史和盛际伪影。因此,将质谱法向化石的应用仍然是对古代分子序列的一种有吸引力的来源,用于开展进化研究,特别是在比较大的可扩增性DNA检测极限的标本中。然而,“质谱”涵盖了一系列基于质量的蛋白质组学方法,每个方法都利用不同的技术和物理原则来产生独特类型的数据,具有自己的优势和挑战。这里,我们讨论了多种质谱技术,其具有或可用于检测和表征考古学和古生物蛋白质,特别关注MALDI-MS,LC-MS / MS,TOF-SIM和MSI。考虑了它们的功能的主要差异,它们产生的数据类型以及成岩作用对其结果的潜在影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号