首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Interlaboratory Comparison of Thermospray and Particle Beam LiquidChromatography/Mass Spectrometry Interfaces: Evaluation of a Chlorinated Phenoxy Acid Herbicide Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Analysis Method
【24h】

Interlaboratory Comparison of Thermospray and Particle Beam LiquidChromatography/Mass Spectrometry Interfaces: Evaluation of a Chlorinated Phenoxy Acid Herbicide Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Analysis Method

机译:热喷雾和粒子束液相色谱/质谱接口的实验室间比较:氯化苯氧基除草剂液相色谱/质谱分析方法的评价

获取原文

摘要

Seven laboratories participated in an interlaboratory evaluation of a liquidchromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) method for the analysis of 10 chlorinated phenoxy acid herbicides. The focus of the evaluation was to test the intercomparability of LC/MS data obtained from two types of LC/MS interfaces (i.e., thermospray (TS) and particle beam (PB)). Eight simulated sample extracts were sent to each laboratory for LC/MS analysis. There were statistically significant differences between interfaces in the quantitative data for all analytes except 2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) propanoic acid (silvex). Particle beam exhibited a high positive bias and a low relative standard deviation at the highest sample extract concentration range, 500 micrograms/mL, while TS showed a low bias and a low relative standard deviation at the lowest sample extract concentration range, 5 micrograms/mL. Another factor of the study was to look for any performance differences between interfaces of the same type, but differing manufacturers. A statistical difference was observed, between PB interfaces, for 2-(1-methylpropyl)-4,6-dinitrophenol (dinoseb). (Copyright (c) 1991 by the American Chemical Society.)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号