首页> 外文期刊>Journal of perinatology: Official journal of the California Perinatal Association >Comparison of single-and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Comparison of single-and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:单双球囊导管进行劳动诱导的比较:随机对照试验的系统回顾与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective There is a paucity of head-to-head randomized trials that compare single-and double-balloon catheters, and the results of the available data in terms of time from catheter insertion to delivery and delivery mode are mixed. This metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials compares the efficacy of single-and double-balloon catheters in women undergoing labor induction.
机译:目的缺乏对比较单个和双球囊导管的头脑随机试验,以及在从导管插入到输送和输送方式的时间内可用数据的结果。 随机对照试验的这种元分析比较了在接受劳动诱导的女性中单次和双球囊导管的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号