首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health care for the poor and underserved >Rurality and Health in the United States: Do Our Measures and Methods Capture Our Intent?
【24h】

Rurality and Health in the United States: Do Our Measures and Methods Capture Our Intent?

机译:美国的风格与健康:我们的措施和方法是否捕获我们的意图?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rural status in the United States can be objectively measured using multiple designations within different geographic extents, often considering both population density and proximity to urban areas. However, these measurements are often incomplete for assessing the relationship between rural status and health and are often inadequately considered in analysis. To address these limitations, we posit four recommendations: two recommendations to improve current measures by including additional factors and making measures continuous and two recommendations to improve regression analysis by considering rural status as a contextual factor in multilevel modeling and as a variable in conjunction with socioeconomic factors derived through principal component analysis.
机译:可以客观地使用不同地理范围内的多个名称客观地测量美国的农村地位,通常考虑人口密度和城市地区的近距离。 然而,这些测量通常不完整,用于评估农村地位与健康之间的关系,并且在分析中往往不足。 为了解决这些限制,我们提供四项建议:通过包括其他因素,并通过将农村地位视为多级建模的语境性因素以及与社会经济形式的语境性因素考虑到额外的因素和措施,提高目前措施的两项建议,以提高目前的措施,并提出两项建议,以改善回归分析。 通过主成分分析来源的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号