...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >The Construal of Workplace Incivility in Honor Cultures: Evidence From Turkey
【24h】

The Construal of Workplace Incivility in Honor Cultures: Evidence From Turkey

机译:荣誉文化中的工作场所犯罪分割的制约因素:来自土耳其的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most research on workplace incivility has been conducted in the United States, where the cultural logic of dignity prescribes that individuals' worthiness be determined in reference to self-set standards. This inductive study explores the construal of workplace incivility in a contrasting cultural logic of honor, where an individual's worth is largely dependent on the esteem of others. In particular, it seeks to understand how the logic of honor may influence which behaviors are labeled as incivility and which criteria are used to appraise uncivil behaviors in the Turkish context. In the first phase of the study, we asked 53 Turkish employees for examples of workplace incivility behaviors and generated 32 incivility episodes. In the second and third phases, using data from 35 business students and 106 Turkish employees, we analyzed these episodes using multidimensional scaling technique. The results suggested that workplace incivility may have both universal and culturally salient manifestations, and that Turkish respondents appraised uncivil behaviors along three dimensions: honor threatening versus ordinary, excluding versus intruding, inoffensive versus offensive. We further observed that Turkish participants differentiated the power of the instigator (supervisor vs. coworker) as well as the omission of versus commission of behaviors. We discuss the results with a focus on understanding how the honor logic may manifest itself in professional relationships.
机译:大多数关于工作场所幸存行的研究已经在美国进行,其中尊严规定的文化逻辑是根据自我设定标准确定个人的价值。这种归纳研究探讨了较为荣誉的文化逻辑的工作场所犯罪性的制约,个人的价值在很大程度上取决于对他人的尊重。特别是,它旨在了解荣誉逻辑的逻辑可能会影响哪些行为被标记为诸如犯罪性,并且使用该标准用于在土耳其背景下评估未经透明的行为。在该研究的第一阶段,我们要求53名土耳其员工进行工作场所亏损行为的例子,并产生32次救球活动。在第二阶段和第三阶段,使用来自35名商业学生和106名土耳其员工的数据,我们使用多维缩放技术分析了这些剧集。结果表明,工作场所的兴趣可能具有普遍和文化突出的表现,而土耳其受访者沿三个维度评估了未经透明的行为:荣誉威胁与普通,不包括侵入,不违规。我们进一步观察到土耳其参与者区分了煽动者(主管与同事)的权力以及与行为委员会的遗漏。我们讨论了结果,重点了解荣誉逻辑如何在专业关系中表现出来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号