首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of prosthodontics >Implant Survival in the Edentulous Jaw-30 Years of Experience. Part I: A Retro-Prospective Multivariate Regression Analysis of Overall Implant Failure in 4,585 Consecutively Treated Arches
【24h】

Implant Survival in the Edentulous Jaw-30 Years of Experience. Part I: A Retro-Prospective Multivariate Regression Analysis of Overall Implant Failure in 4,585 Consecutively Treated Arches

机译:植入物生存在透明下颌 - 30年的经验。 第一部分:4,585个连续处理拱门的整体植入物失效的复古前瞻性多元回归分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To report retro-prospective data on the prevalence of overall implant failure in a large number of edentulous patients treated at one referral clinic over a 30-year period and to analyze possible associations between implant failure and basic clinical variables Materials and Methods: Altogether, 24,781 implants were consecutively placed in 4,585 edentulous arches between 1986 and 2015. All implant failures identified at the clinic during follow-up were consecutively recorded, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify possible associations between implant failure and different clinical factors. Results: Altogether, 1,333, 688, and 249 treated arches were followed up for 15, 20, and 25 years, respectively. Cumulative survival rates (CSR) for the treated arches were 86.2% and 83.8% after 15 and 25 years, respectively. Most patients lost only one implant each (58%). Loss of all implants was reported in 68 arches, with total failure rates of 1.9% and 2.2% after 15 and 25 years, respectively. The strongest associations with increased risk for implant failure were maxilla (hazard ratio [HR] 4.76: 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.70 to 6.25) and implant surface (HR 2.38: 95% CI 1.59 to 3.57). Age at surgery, implant surgeon, calendar year of surgery, and time of follow-up also showed significant associations with risk of implant failure (P .05). A completely steady-state level in implant survival was not observed, but few implants were lost up to the last years of follow-up. Conclusion: There is a higher risk for implant failure in the maxilla compared to the mandible. Risk is reduced when using implants with a moderately rough surface. The highest risk for failure was observed during the first year. This was followed by a reduced failure rate, which never reached a steady-state level.
机译:目的:报告在30年期间在一个推荐诊所治疗的大量临床患者中对整个植入患者的患病率的复古潜在数据,并分析植入失败和基本临床变量的可能关联材料和方法:完全,24,781个植入物在1986年至2015年间,连续置于4,585名薄型拱门中。连续记录在后续随访期间在临床期间鉴定的所有植入失败,并进行多元逻辑回归分析,以识别植入失败和不同临床因素之间可能的关联。结果:共有1,333,688和249拱,分别为15,20和25年。累积存活率(CSR)分别为15至25岁以后86.2%和83.8%。大多数患者每人只丢失一个植入物(58%)。报告了68名拱门的所有植入物的丧失,总失败率分别为15至25岁后的1.9%和2.2%。植入物失败风险增加的最强的关联是上颌(危险比[HR] 4.76:95%置信区间[CI] 3.70至6.25)和植入表面(HR 2.38:95%CI 1.59至3.57)。手术年龄,植入外科医生,手术日历年和随访时间也显示出具有植入物失败风险的重要关联(P <.05)。未观察到植入物存活中完全稳态水平,但少数几年的随访失去了很少的植入物。结论:与下颌骨相比,颌骨中植入物失效风险较高。当使用具有中等粗糙表面的植入物时,风险降低。在第一年观察到失败的最高风险。这是降低的失败率,从未达到稳态水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号