首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry >The Fence Technique: 100% Autogenous Bone Graft vs 50% Deproteinized Bovine Bone Matrix and 50% Autogenous Bone Graft. A Histologic Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

The Fence Technique: 100% Autogenous Bone Graft vs 50% Deproteinized Bovine Bone Matrix and 50% Autogenous Bone Graft. A Histologic Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:围栏技术:100%自体骨移植物与50%脱蛋牛骨基质和50%自生骨移植物。 组织学随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this histologic, single-blind, parallel, randomized clinical trial was to compare vertical bone augmentation grafting with 100% autogenous bone (group AB) vs 50% deproteinized bovine bone matrix (DBBM)/50% autogenous bone (group BOAB) using the Fence Technique in a two-stage implant placement A biopsy was performed in the regenerated area at implant insertion 6 months after the augmentation surgery. The results reflect a sample size of four patients treated per group. At implant placement, 6 months after grafting, no significant differences were evident in the histomorphometric comparisons, even if the percentage of residual graft was obviously greater in the BOAB group (P = .0314).
机译:该组织学,单盲,平行,随机临床试验的目的是将垂直骨增强接枝与100%自体骨(AB族)与50%脱蛋白牛骨基质(DBBM)/ 50%自体骨(组合胶)进行比较 在两阶段植入物中使用栅栏技术在增强手术后6个月内在植入物插入的再生区域中进行活组织检查。 结果反映了每组治疗的四名患者的样本量。 在植入物展示位置,在接枝后6个月,即使在BOAB组中剩余移植物明显大于剩余移植物的百分比,在组织形态比较中没有显着差异(P = .0314)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号