首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >The Effects of Surgical Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Varus Osteoarthritic Knee on the Rotational Alignment of Femoral Component: Gap Balancing Technique versus Measured Resection Technique
【24h】

The Effects of Surgical Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Varus Osteoarthritic Knee on the Rotational Alignment of Femoral Component: Gap Balancing Technique versus Measured Resection Technique

机译:对股骨骨关节骨形成术全膝关节形成术的手术技术对股骨部件旋转对准的影响:间隙平衡技术与测量切除技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Few studies have compared the accuracy of femoral component rotation in the measured resection technique according to the preoperative computed tomography (CT) and gap balancing technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a difference in accuracy and outlier incidence of femoral component rotation between gap balancing and measured resection techniques with or without preoperative CT and to evaluate the difference in patellofemoral alignment on simple radiographs and clinical outcomes. In this retrospective study, we evaluated femoral component rotation angle on the clinical and surgical transepicondylar axis (FCRA-cTEA and FCRA-sTEA, respectively), patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar displacement, and patient-reported outcomes in the gap balancing technique (Group 1) and in the measured resection technique without (Group 2) and with (Group 3) preoperative CT. A total of 163 total knee arthoplasty (TKA) replacements were included in this study. Average FCRA-cTEA was -3.4 +/- 2.6, -2.8 +/- 2.1, and -1.8 +/- 2.3 degrees in groups 1 to 3, respectively ( p = 0.002). Average FCRA-sTEA was -0.2 +/- 2.7, 0.5 +/- 2.4, and 1.5 +/- 2.1 degrees, respectively ( p = 0.001). In an outlier analysis that evaluated femoral component rotation using cTEA as reference, no significant difference was observed between the three groups (40.8, 37.3, and 23.7%, respectively, p = 0.133). When sTEA was used as a reference, groups 1 and 3 showed an outlier incidence of 8.2 and 8.5%, respectively, whereas this incidence was as high as 23.5% in group 2 ( p = 0.030). No statistically significant group difference in patellofemoral alignment and patient-reported outcome was observed. In the measured resection technique with preoperative CT, the femoral component was externally rotated approximately 1 degree more than in the gap balancing or measured resection technique without preoperative CT. However, the difference in FCRA among the three techniques was not linked to the difference in patellofemoral alignment or patient-reported outcomes.
机译:少量研究比较了根据术前计算断层扫描(CT)和间隙平衡技术的测量切除技术中的股骨成分旋转的准确性。本研究的目的是评估股骨平衡和测量的切除技术之间的准确性和股骨部件旋转的精度和异常率的发生率是否有或没有术前CT的测定的切除技术,并评估在简单的射线照片和临床结果上的PatellofOremoral对准的差异。在这项回顾性研究中,我们在临床和外科的TransepiconyL轴(分别),髌骨倾斜角,侧髌骨位移和差距平衡技术中的患者报告的结果上评估了股骨分量旋转角度(分别1)和在没有(第2组)和(第3组)术前CT的测量切除技术中。本研究共用了总共163个全膝关节术(TKA)替代品。平均FCRA-CTEA分别为-3.4 +/- 2.6,-2.8 +/- 2.1,分别为-1.8 +/- 2.3度,分别为-1.8 +/- 2.3度(p = 0.002)。平均FCRA-STEA分别为-0.2 +/- 2.7,0.5 +/- 2.4和1.5 +/- 2.1度(p = 0.001)。在使用CTEA作为参考的评估股骨组分旋转的异常分析中,在三组(40.8,37.3和23.7%之间没有观察到显着差异,P = 0.133)。当STEA用作参考时,第1组和3分别显示出8.2和8.5%的异常发病率,而该发病率在2组中高达23.5%(P = 0.030)。没有观察到Patelloforal取向和患者报告的结果的统计学上显着的群体差异。在具有术前CT的测量切除技术中,股骨部件在外部旋转大约1度,比在没有术前CT的情况下在间隙平衡或测得的切除技术中旋转大约1度。然而,三种技术中的FCRA差异与Patelloforal取向或患者报告的结果的差异无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号