首页> 外文期刊>The journal of alternative and complementary medicine: research on paradigm, practice, and policy >A Feasibility Study of Group-Delivered Behavioral Interventions for Insomnia Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Comparing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia and a Mind-Body Intervention
【24h】

A Feasibility Study of Group-Delivered Behavioral Interventions for Insomnia Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Comparing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia and a Mind-Body Intervention

机译:乳腺癌幸存者中失眠的群体交付行为干预的可行性研究:对失眠的认知行为疗法和心理干预的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: An estimated 30%-50% of breast cancer survivors (BCSs) report persistent insomnia, which may affect daytime functioning and quality of life, and lead to longer term health complications. Although the gold standard insomnia intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), has demonstrated efficacy, accessibility is limited due to a scarcity of trained providers, and adherence to therapy is variable. Group-delivered alternative therapies may offer an opportunity to reach and treat BCSs with insomnia. This pilot study was designed to assess feasibility of a group-delivered mind-body intervention compared with group-delivered CBT-I among BCSs. Design: The authors recruited n = 25 stages I - IV BCSs to a 9-week trial of group therapy for insomnia. Eligible women were assigned to the next upcoming group until it was full. Primary outcomes were to assess intervention feasibility measured by (1) qualitative focus group feedback and (2) attendance. The feasibility of using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was also assessed in this population and ISI change scores were gathered to allow for power calculations in a future trial. Means and frequencies were used to describe participant demographics and attendance. Results: The authors found higher attendance (86% vs. 67% of sessions) and greater satisfaction with the intervention (84.6% vs. 57.1%) reported among mind-body participants than among CBT-I participants. Qualitative feedback suggested more group cohesion among the mind-body group and lower incentive to attend in-person among the CBT-I group. Conclusions: The results suggest that delivering a mind-body intervention for BCSs is feasible and acceptable, based on attendance and qualitative feedback.
机译:目的:估计30%-50%的乳腺癌幸存者(BCSS)报告持续失眠,这可能影响日间功能和生活质量,并导致持续的健康并发症。虽然黄金标准失眠干预,对失眠的认知行为治疗(CBT-I),具有效力,可访问性由于培训的提供者的稀缺而受到限制,并且对治疗的粘附是可变的。集团交付的替代疗法可能提供机会与失眠达成并治疗BCSS。该试点研究旨在评估与BCS之间的群体交付的CBT-I相比,评估群体交付的思维症干预的可行性。设计:作者招募了n = 25阶段I - IV BCSS,以9周的失眠群治疗试验。符合条件的女性被分配到下一个即将到来的集团,直到它已满。主要结果是评估(1)定性焦点组反馈和(2)出席的介入可行性。使用失眠幅度指数(ISI)的可行性也被评估,并收集了ISI变化分数,以便在未来的试验中进行功率计算。手段和频率用于描述参与者人口统计和出勤率。结果:作者发现了更高的出勤率(86%与67%的会议),并在思维组参与者中报告的干预(84.6%与57.1%)的满意度高于CBT-I参与者。定性反馈表明,在CBT-I集团中,在思维体组中的群体凝聚力和较低的激励措施。结论:结果表明,根据出勤率和定性反馈,提供对BCSS的思维态度是可行的和可接受的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号