首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H. Journal of Engineering in Medicine >Comparison of a fixed-grid and arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian methods on modelling fluid-structure interaction of the aortic valve
【24h】

Comparison of a fixed-grid and arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian methods on modelling fluid-structure interaction of the aortic valve

机译:固定电网和任意拉格朗日 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 欧拉 - 血管结构型相互作用的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study was aimed at assessing the robustness of a fixed-grid fluid-structure interaction method (Multi-Material Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian) to modelling the two-dimensional native aortic valve dynamics and comparing it to the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method. For the fixed-grid method, the explicit finite element solver LS-DYNA was utilized, where two independent meshes for the fluid and structure were generated and the penalty method was used to handle the coupling between the fluid and structure domains. For the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method, the implicit finite element solver ADINA was used where two separate conforming meshes were used for the valve structure and the fluid domains. The comparison demonstrated that both fluid-structure interaction methods predicted accurately the valve dynamics, fluid flow, and stress distribution, implying that fixed-grid methods can be used in situations where the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method fails.
机译:本研究旨在评估固定电网流体 - 结构相互作用方法(多材料任意拉格朗日 - 欧拉)的鲁棒性,以建模二维天然主动脉瓣动力学,并将其与任意拉格朗日 - 欧拉米列方法进行比较。 对于固定电网方法,利用了显式有限元求解器LS-DYNA,其中产生用于流体和结构的两个独立网格,使用惩罚方法处理流体和结构域之间的偶联。 对于任意拉格朗日 - 欧拉米兰方法,使用隐式有限元求解器Adina,其中两个单独的符合网格用于阀结构和流体畴。 比较表明,两种流体结构相互作用方法预测到阀门动力学,流体流量和应力分布,这意味着固定网格方法可用于任意拉格朗日 - 欧拉方法失败的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号