首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves: Comparison between Immersed Boundary and Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Techniques for the Mesh Representation
【2h】

Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves: Comparison between Immersed Boundary and Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Techniques for the Mesh Representation

机译:人工主动脉瓣的流体-结构相互作用模拟:浸入式边界和任意拉格朗日-欧拉技术在网格表示中的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In recent years the role of FSI (fluid-structure interaction) simulations in the analysis of the fluid-mechanics of heart valves is becoming more and more important, being able to capture the interaction between the blood and both the surrounding biological tissues and the valve itself. When setting up an FSI simulation, several choices have to be made to select the most suitable approach for the case of interest: in particular, to simulate flexible leaflet cardiac valves, the type of discretization of the fluid domain is crucial, which can be described with an ALE (Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian) or an Eulerian formulation. The majority of the reported 3D heart valve FSI simulations are performed with the Eulerian formulation, allowing for large deformations of the domains without compromising the quality of the fluid grid. Nevertheless, it is known that the ALE-FSI approach guarantees more accurate results at the interface between the solid and the fluid. The goal of this paper is to describe the same aortic valve model in the two cases, comparing the performances of an ALE-based FSI solution and an Eulerian-based FSI approach. After a first simplified 2D case, the aortic geometry was considered in a full 3D set-up. The model was kept as similar as possible in the two settings, to better compare the simulations’ outcomes. Although for the 2D case the differences were unsubstantial, in our experience the performance of a full 3D ALE-FSI simulation was significantly limited by the technical problems and requirements inherent to the ALE formulation, mainly related to the mesh motion and deformation of the fluid domain. As a secondary outcome of this work, it is important to point out that the choice of the solver also influenced the reliability of the final results.
机译:近年来,FSI(流体-结构相互作用)仿真在心脏瓣膜的流体力学分析中的作用变得越来越重要,因为它能够捕获血液与周围生物组织和瓣膜之间的相互作用本身。设置FSI模拟时,必须做出几种选择,以针对感兴趣的情况选择最合适的方法:特别是,对于模拟柔性小叶心脏瓣膜,流体域的离散化类型至关重要,可以描述为带有ALE(任意拉格朗日欧拉)或欧拉公式。大多数报道的3D心脏瓣膜FSI仿真都是使用欧拉公式进行的,从而允许在不损害流体网格质量的情况下对区域进行大变形。然而,众所周知,ALE-FSI方法可确保在固体和流体之间的界面获得更准确的结果。本文的目的是在两种情况下描述相同的主动脉瓣模型,比较基于ALE的FSI解决方案和基于欧拉的FSI方法的性能。在第一个简化的2D情况下,在完整的3D设置中考虑了主动脉的几何形状。在两种设置中,模型都尽可能保持相似,以更好地比较模拟结果。尽管对于2D情况而言,差异并不明显,但根据我们的经验,完整3D ALE-FSI仿真的性能受到ALE公式固有的技术问题和要求的严重限制,这主要与网格运动和流体域变形有关。作为这项工作的次要结果,必须指出,求解器的选择还影响最终结果的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号