...
首页> 外文期刊>Sleep and biological rhythms. >Examining the structure validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
【24h】

Examining the structure validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

机译:检查匹兹堡睡眠质量指数的结构有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a widely used measurement tool for assessing sleep disturbance and is broadly used in clinical and healthy populations. Yet, validation of the PSQI has rarely been carried out for a relatively large non-clinical sample in the United States. The aim for the current study is to examine the structure validity of the PSQI. Data from 2189 individuals (mean age 35.88) were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Furthermore, measurement invariance across age groups was examined using multigroup CFA. We found that a three-factor model (i.e., sleep efficiency, sleep latency, and sleep quality) fitted better than the commonly used single-factor structure. Specifically, for the three-factor model, the comparative fit index was 0.99, the Tucker-Lewis fit index was 0.99, and the root-mean-square error of approximation was 0.04. Those fit indices further indicated a good fit between the model and the observed data. Measurement invariance results suggested that the factor structure ofPSQI is not comparable for different age groups, which has implications for future research studies. Our findings validated the factor structure of the PSQI on non-clinical populations and recommended the use of three separate factors to assess sleep quality. In addition, the findings demonstrated that different models should be used to assess sleep disturbance across age groups. However, further research is required to determine the appropriate cut-off points for different age groups.
机译:匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)是一种广泛使用的测量工具,用于评估睡眠障碍,广泛用于临床和健康人口。然而,在美国的相对较大的非临床样本中很少对PSQI的验证很少进行。目前研究的目的是检查PSQI的结构有效性。通过探索性因子分析(EFA)分析来自2189个个体(平均年龄35.88)的数据,然后进行验证因子分析(CFA)。此外,使用MultiCroup CFA检查跨年龄组的测量不变性。我们发现,三因素模型(即睡眠效率,睡眠等待时间和睡眠质量)均优于常用的单因素结构。具体地,对于三因素模型,比较拟合指数为0.99,Tucker-Lewis Fit指数为0.99,近似的根均方误差为0.04。这些拟合指数进一步表示模型与观察到的数据之间的良好拟合。测量不变性结果表明,对不同年龄组的因子结构对不同年龄组没有可比,这对未来的研究研究有影响。我们的调查结果验证了非临床群体上PSQI的因子结构,并建议使用三个单独的因素来评估睡眠质量。此外,研究结果表明,应使用不同的模型来评估跨年龄群体的睡眠障碍。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定不同年龄组的适当截止点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号