首页> 外文期刊>Surgical and radiologic anatomy : >Peer-assisted learning versus didactic teaching in osteology for first-year Indian undergraduate medical students: a quasi-experimental study
【24h】

Peer-assisted learning versus didactic teaching in osteology for first-year Indian undergraduate medical students: a quasi-experimental study

机译:对同行辅助学习与骨质学前一年内印度本科医学院的教学教学:准实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The utility of peer-assisted learning (PAL) in anatomy education has been recognized. In this study, PAL was incorporated into osteology teaching for the first-year medical students and compared to traditional didactic methods (TDM). Methods This was a cross-over intervention study. The class of 60 students was divided into two equal groups. The first group underwent PAL for five upper limb osteology sessions and TDM for all lower limb osteology classes. The second group underwent TDM for five upper limb osteology classes and PAL for lower limb osteology classes. A pre-session test (PrST) and post-session test (PoST) were conducted for each session using multiple choice type questions. Perceptions of students about PAL were collected using a questionnaire. Between and within group differences were estimated using the independent sample T test and paired T test, respectively. The responses in the questionnaire were summarized and open-ended responses categorized into broad themes. Results Greater group differences were noted in the PrST as compared to the PoST mean scores, with the PAL group showing higher mean scores for both upper and lower limb sessions. Significantly higher PoST scores compared to PrST scores for all the sessions were observed regardless of the method used. Significantly higher scores in the PrST or PoST scores were noted in the PAL group for five sessions. Most aspects of PAL were appreciated by the students. Conclusions This study provides evidence that PAL is at least as effective as TDM in learning osteology among the first-year medical students.
机译:目的,同行辅助学习(PAL)在解剖学教育中得到了认可。在本研究中,PAL被纳入一年医学生的骨科教学,并与传统的教学方法(TDM)相比。方法这是一个交叉干预研究。 60名学生分为两个相等的群体。第一组接受了五个上肢骨质学会和TDM的所有下肢骨质课程。第二组对下肢骨质类别课程和PAL进行了TDM的TDM。使用多项选择类型问题对每个会话进行一次会话测试(PRST)和会话后测试(帖子)。使用调查问卷收集对PAL学生的看法。使用独立的样品T测试和配对T测试估计组差异之间。调查问卷中的答复总结了和开放的反应,分为广泛主题。结果与邮政划分得分相比,PRST在PLST中指出了更大的群体差异,PAL组显示了上下肢体和下肢的平均分。与所使用的方法相比,观察到与所有会话的PRST分数相比显着更高。在PAL集团中,PLS集团在五次会议中指出了PRST或职位分数的得分显着更高。学生的大多数方面都受到了学生的赞赏。结论本研究提供了证据,即PAL至少与第一年医学生学习骨质学中的TDM一样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号