...
首页> 外文期刊>Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery: Official Journal of the World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery >A Comparative Study of Fiducial-Based and Fiducial-Less Registration Utilizing the O-Arm
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Fiducial-Based and Fiducial-Less Registration Utilizing the O-Arm

机译:利用O形臂的基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于的基于基于基于基于的基于基于基于的基于基于基于的注册的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Frameless stereotactic surgery utilizing fiducial-based (FB) registration is an established tool in the armamentarium of deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgeons. Fiducial-less (FL) registration via intraoperative CT, such as the O-arm, has been routinely used in spine surgery, but its accuracy for DBS surgery has not been studied in a clinical setting. Objective: We undertook a study to analyze the accuracy of the FL technique in DBS surgery and compare it to the FB method. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 97 patients underwent DBS surgery using the NexFrame and the O-arm registration stereotactic system. Patients underwent FB (n = 50) registration from 2015 to 2016 and FL (n = 47) O-arm registration from 2016 to 2017. Results: The radial errors (RE) and vector/euclidean errors of FB and FL registration were not significantly different. There was no difference in additional passes between methods, but there was an increase in the number of RE >= 2.5 mm in the FL method. Conclusion: Although there was no statistically significant difference in RE or the need for additional passes, the increased number of errors >= 2.5 mm with the FL method (17 vs. 4% in FB) indicates the need for further study. We concluded that O-arm images of the implants should be utilized to assess and correct for this error. (C) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:利用基于基于基于基于基于基于基于基于FB的(FB)注册是深脑刺激(DBS)外科医生的既定工具。通过术中CT(如O形臂)的基准较少(FL)注册已经常规用于脊柱手术,但其对临床环境中的DBS手术的准确性尚未研究。目的:我们对DBS手术中的FL技术的准确性进行了研究,并将其与FB方法进行比较。方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,97例患者使用NEXFRAME和O形臂注册立体定向系统进行DBS手术。从2015年到2016年的FB(n = 50)注册的患者从2016年到2017年开始注册到2016年和FL(n = 47)O-ARM注册。结果:FB和FL登记的径向误差(RE)和媒体/欧几里德误差没有显着不同的。方法之间的额外传递没有差异,但FL方法中的RE> = 2.5mm的数量增加。结论:虽然RE没有统计学上有显着性差异或需要额外的通行证,但误差的数量增加> = 2.5mm,FL法(FB中的17%)表示需要进一步研究。我们得出结论,植入物的O形臂图像应用于评估和纠正此错误。 (c)2019年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号