首页> 外文期刊>Sportverletzung Sportschaden: Organ der Gesellschaft fu?r Orthopa?disch-Traumatologische Sportmedizin >Comparison of a Combined Strength and Handball-Specific Training vs. Isolated Strength Training in Handball Players Studying Physical Education
【24h】

Comparison of a Combined Strength and Handball-Specific Training vs. Isolated Strength Training in Handball Players Studying Physical Education

机译:比较综合强度和手球特定培训与孤立的力量训练在学习体育的手球运动员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of combined resistance training including handbal-lspecific drill (CRT) with resistance training excluding handball-specific drill training (NSDT). Materials and methods Twenty-two male handball players who studied physical education were randomly assigned to two groups: CRT (combined resistance training with sportspecific drill; n = 12) and NSDT (resistance training without any sport-specific drill training; n = 10). Over a 10-week period during the competitive season, the players performed a specific training program twice per week, which replaced their normal team handball training. The CRT regimen consisted of a combined (associated) resistance training and handball- specific drill, whereas the NSDT program consisted of a resistance training without handball-specific drill (dissociated). Pre-and post-test measures included squat jump and countermovement jumps, bench press, back half squats, throwing velocity during a 3-step jump throw, and a jump shot, repeated-sprint ability (six 2 x 15-m shuttle sprints) (RSA), medicine ball throw and anthropometric measurements. Results In both groups, significant intervention effects (d = 1.0) were seen for all sprint (3/3), throwing (3/3) and jump (2/2) measures. Regarding maximal strength param-eters, an effect size lower than 0.5 was only detected in the NSDT group for half back squats (d = 0.48). The largest effects were observed in the NSDT group for squat jump (d = 6.20) and medicine ball throw (d = 6.07). Interaction effects (group x time) were found for 50 % (5/10) of parameters. The greatest difference between groups regarding performance development over time was detected for jump shot (interaction effect:. (2) = 0.748). In contrast, there was no difference in performance development in both groups over time for RSAbest (interaction effect:. (2) = 0.025). Conclusions The current findings suggest that during the competitive season, 10 weeks of CRT with only two training sessions per week improved numerous measures of athletic performance in handball students of physical education. Such conditioning should be highly recommended as part of the annual training program of handball players.
机译:目的本研究的目的是比较抗性训练(CRT)的抗性训练,除了手球专用钻探训练(NSDT)。材料和方法二十二名男性手球运动员学习体育的男性被随机分配到两组:CRT(与运动特异性钻头的抗性训练组合; N = 12)和NSDT(无需任何运动特定演习训练的阻力训练; N = 10) 。在竞争季节,球员在竞争季节的一个10周内,每周两次进行了特定的培训计划,这取代了他们的正常团队手球培训。 CRT方案包括组合(相关的)电阻训练和手球专用钻头,而NSDT程序由无手球专用钻头(解离)的电阻训练组成。测试前后措施包括蹲伏跳跃和对策跳跃,卧床,后半下蹲下,在三步跳投期间抛出速度,跳投,重复冲刺能力(六2 x 15-m班车冲刺) (RSA),药球投掷和人体测量测量。结果两组,对所有Sprint(3/3),投掷(3/3)和跳跃(2/2)措施看出显着的干预效果(D = 1.0)。关于最大强度参数,效果大小仅在NSDT组中检测到半后蹲下(D = 0.48)。在NSDT组中观察到最大的效果,用于蹲下跳跃(D = 6.20)和药球投掷(D = 6.07)。发现互动效应(组X时间)50%(5/10)参数。对跳投的跳投(互动效应:(2)= 0.748)检测到随时间的性能发展之间的最大差异。相比之下,两组在rsabest的时间表现开发中没有差异(相互作用:(2)= 0.025)。结论目前的调查结果表明,在竞争季节,每周只有两周的CRT,只有两次培训课程改善了体育学生手球学生的众多运动表现措施。应强烈推荐这种调节作为手球运动员年度培训计划的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号