首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of public health >Rethinking the relationship between socioeconomic status and health: Challenging how socioeconomic status is currently used in health inequality research
【24h】

Rethinking the relationship between socioeconomic status and health: Challenging how socioeconomic status is currently used in health inequality research

机译:重新思考社会经济地位与健康之间的关系:挑战社会经济地位目前如何用于健康不等式研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health recently reiterated the importance of addressing social justice and health inequalities in its new editorial policy announcement. One of the related challenges highlighted in that issue was the limited use of sociological theories able to inform the complexity linking the resources and mechanisms captured by the concept of socioeconomic status. This debate article argues that part of the problem lies in the often unchallenged reliance on a generic conceptualization and operationalization of socioeconomic status. These practices hinder researchers’ capacity to examine in finer detail how resources and circumstances promote the unequal distribution of health through distinct yet intertwined pathways. As a potential way forward, this commentary explores how research practices can be challenged through concrete publication policies and guidelines. To this end, we propose a set of recommendations as a tool to strengthen the study of socioeconomic status and, ultimately, the quality of health inequality research. Conclusions: Authors, reviewers, and editors can become champions of change toward the implementation of sociological theory by holding higher standards regarding the conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and interpretation of results in health inequality research .
机译:旨在:斯堪的纳维亚公共卫生杂志最近重申了解决其新编辑政策公告中的社会司法和健康不平等的重要性。该问题中强调的相关挑战之一是使用社会学理论的利用有限,能够通知与社会经济地位概念所捕获的资源和机制联系起来的复杂性。本辩论文章认为,部分问题在于,往往是对社会经济地位的通用概念化和运作的依次依赖依赖。这些实践阻碍了研究人员在更好的细节中审查的能力如何通过独特但交织的途径促进资源和情况如何促进健康的不平等分配。作为一种潜在的方式,这项评论探讨了如何通过具体出版政策和指南挑战研究实践。为此,我们提出了一套建议作为加强对社会经济地位的研究的工具,并最终是健康不等式研究的质量。结论:作者,审稿人和编辑可以通过持有较高标准的概念化,运作,分析和对健康不等式研究结果的概念化,运作,分析和解释来实现社会学理论的改变冠军。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号