...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach
【24h】

A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach

机译:道德教学中面对面和在线交付的元分析比较:混合方法的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the growing body of literature on training in the responsible conduct of research, few studies have examined the effectiveness of delivery formats used in ethics courses (i.e., face-to-face, online, hybrid). The present effort sought to address this gap in the literature through a meta-analytic review of 66 empirical studies, representing 106 ethics courses and 10,069 participants. The frequency and effectiveness of 67 instructional and process-based content areas were also assessed for each delivery format. Process-based contents were best delivered face-to-face, whereas contents delivered online were most effective when restricted to compliance-based instructional contents. Overall, hybrid courses were found to be most effective, suggesting that ethics courses are best delivered using a blend of formats and content areas. Implications and recommendations for future development of ethics education courses in the sciences are discussed.
机译:尽管在研究的负责任的培训方面越来越多,但很少有研究已经研究了道德课程中使用的交付格式的有效性(即面对面,在线,混合)。 目前的努力试图通过对66个实证研究的元分析审查,代表106个伦理课程和10,069名参与者来解决文献中的这种差距。 对于每种递送格式,还评估了67个教学和基于过程的内容区域的频率和有效性。 基于过程的内容最佳地送到面对面,而在线交付的内容在仅限于基于合规的教学内容时最有效。 总体而言,发现混合课程是最有效的,这表明道德课程最好使用格式和内容领域的混合来交付。 讨论了在科学中伦理教育课程的未来发展的影响和建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号