...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopedics >Normative Functional Outcomes as a New Outcome Assessment Tool Following Hip Procedures
【24h】

Normative Functional Outcomes as a New Outcome Assessment Tool Following Hip Procedures

机译:髋关节程序后,规范性功能结果作为新的结果评估工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patient-reported outcome measures play an important role in evaluating the functional outcome of surgical and nonsurgical treatments of the hip joint. One thousand healthy volunteers completed the modified Harris hip score, the University of California, Los Angeles score, the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score. Between September 2010 and December 2015, a total of 127 periacetabular osteotomies were performed in 111 patients with symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip. Forty-two of these patients (10 male and 32 female) met inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 32 months (range, 1359 months). Pre- and postoperative radiographic analysis of the lateral center-edge angle and the acetabular index was conducted in all cases with a proper pelvic anteroposterior radiograph. The patients completed the modified Harris hip score, the University of California, Los Angeles score, the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score. The authors investigated the influence of various confounding variables to (1) obtain recommendations when outcome scores are being compared between 2 cohorts and (2) define a normative reference level of "hip-healthy" functionality. This normative level of functionality was used as a target level of functionality following a hip procedure such as periacetabular osteotomy. All functional outcome scores had significantly improved 1 year after periacetabular osteotomy; thus, patients were much better than preoperatively. However, only 55% achieved the 95% functionality of the normative population based on modified Harris hip score and University of California, Los Angeles score. The results were worse for the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales. This approach places the results of surgical procedures in a different but potentially more realistic perspective in terms of expectations and goals.
机译:患者报告的结果措施在评估髋关节的外科和非术治疗的功能结果方面发挥着重要作用。一千名健康志愿者完成了修改后的哈里斯休克分数,加州大学,洛杉矶分数,髋关节骨关节炎结果得分,以及西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数分数。 2010年9月至2015年12月期间,111例患有111例髋关节发育不良患者的111例患者中均为127例终止带叛者骨膜切片。这些患者中的四十二(10名男性和32名女性)符合纳入标准。平均随访32个月(范围,1359个月)。在所有骨盆前后射线图像中的所有情况下,在所有情况下进行了侧向中心边缘角度和髋臼指数的预先和术后放射线图。患者完成了加州大学洛杉矶分数,髋关节骨关节炎评分,以及西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数分数。作者调查了各种混淆变量对(1)的影响,获得了2个队列和(2)之间的结果评分时的建议,限定了“髋关节健康”功能的规范性参考水平。这种规范性的功能水平被用作髋关节过程之类的髋关节过程之类的髋关节过程之后的靶水平。所有功能结果评分在终止术截骨术后1年显着改善;因此,患者比术前更好。然而,仅基于修改的哈里斯臀部分数和加州大学,洛杉矶分数,只有55%的规范性群体的功能。对于髋关节骨关节炎结果得分分量,结果对结果差。这种方法在期望和目标方面,在不同但潜在的现实角度下将手术程序的结果放在不同但可能更现实的角度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号