首页> 外文期刊>Maternal and child health journal >Estimating the Burden of Prematurity on Infant Mortality: A Comparison of Death Certificates and Child Fatality Review in Ohio, 2009-2013
【24h】

Estimating the Burden of Prematurity on Infant Mortality: A Comparison of Death Certificates and Child Fatality Review in Ohio, 2009-2013

机译:估算婴儿死亡率的早产权:俄亥俄州死亡证明与儿童死亡审查的比较,2009 - 2013年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Infant mortality is a key population health indicator, and accurate cause of death reporting is necessary to design infant mortality prevention strategies. Death certificates and child fatality review (CFR) both track leading infant causes of death in Ohio but produce different results. Our aim was to determine the frequency and characteristics of differences between the two systems to understand both cause of death ranking systems for Ohio. Methods We linked and analyzed data from death certificates and CFR records for all infant deaths (aged < 1 year) in Ohio during 2009-2013. Death certificate and CFR cause of death assignments were compared. Kappa statistic was used to measure concordance. Death certificate-CFR cause of death pairs were plotted to identify common concordant and discordant pairs. Results A total of 5030 infant deaths with death certificate and CFR records were analyzed. The most common discordant cause of death pair was other perinatal condition on the death certificate and prematurity by CFR (1119). Specific injury categories had higher concordance (kappa 0.71-1.00) than medical categories (kappa 0.00-0.78). Among 456 deaths categorized as sudden infant death syndrome on death certificates, approximately 50% (230) were categorized as missing, unknown, or undetermined by CFR. Discussion Linking death certificate and CFR causes of death provided a more robust understanding of infant causes of death in Ohio. Separately, each system serves distinct and valuable purposes that should be reviewed before selecting one system for ranking leading causes of infant mortality.
机译:引言婴儿死亡率是一个关键人口健康指标,准确的死亡原因是设计婴儿死亡率预防策略所必需的。死亡证明和儿童死亡证审查(CFR)在俄亥俄州的追踪领先的婴儿死因,但产生不同的结果。我们的目标是确定两个系统之间差异的频率和特征,以了解俄亥俄州的死亡排名系统的原因。方法我们在2009 - 2013年期间在俄亥俄州的所有婴儿死亡人员和CFR记录中联系和分析了来自死亡证明和CFR记录的数据。比较死亡证明和死亡分配的CFR原因。 kappa统计数据用于衡量一致性。绘制了死亡证书-CFR原因,以识别共同的一致性和不和谐的对。结果分析了总共5030名婴儿死亡证明和CFR记录。死亡对中最常见的不安全原因是CFR(1119)死亡证明和早产的其他围产期病症。特定伤害类别高于医疗类别(Kappa 0.71-1.00)(Kappa 0.71-1.00)(Kappa 0.00-0.78)。在456例死亡中,作为死亡证明突然的婴儿死亡综合征,约有50%(230)分类为CFR缺失,未知或未确定。讨论联系死亡证明和CFR死因的讨论为俄亥俄州的婴幼儿死因提供了更强大的理解。另外,每个系统在选择一个排名的婴儿死亡率的领先原因之前,每个系统都可以进行差异和有价值的目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号