首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation & the health professions >The Association Between Peer and Self-Assessments and Professionalism Lapses Among Medical Students
【24h】

The Association Between Peer and Self-Assessments and Professionalism Lapses Among Medical Students

机译:同行与自我评估与专业性之间的关联在医学生中失效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Peer and self-assessments are widely used to assess professionalism during medical school as part of a multisource feedback model. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between peer and self-assessments and professionalism lapses at a large medical school. A retrospective case-control study design was used to compare peer and self-assessment scores from Years 1 to 3 of medical school for students who had been cited for professionalism lapses during medical school (case group; n = 78) with those of a randomly selected control group (n = 230). Students in the case group had significantly lower peer assessment scores than students in the control group during all 3 years. Year 3 peer assessment scores showed the greatest difference (cases = 7.81 +/- 0.65, controls = 8.22 +/- 0.34, p < .01). Students with lower peer assessment scores were also significantly more likely to have been cited for a professionalism lapse (odds ratio = 6.25, 95% CI [3.13, 11.11], p < .01). This study reinforces the value of peer assessments of professionalism, which may be useful to help identify students who may be at risk for professionalism lapses during medical school.
机译:同行和自我评估被广泛用于评估医学院期间的专业性,作为多源反馈模型的一部分。本研究的目的是审查一所大型医学院的同行和自我评估和专业性之间的协会。回顾性案例对照研究设计用于比较年度1至3年度医学院的同行和自我评估分数,为医学院(案例组; N = 78)在医学院(案例组; N = 78)与那些随机的学生所选控制组(n = 230)。案例集团的学生在3年内比对照组的学生显着降低了同行评估得分。第3年同行评估分数显示出最大的差异(案例= 7.81 +/- 0.65,Control = 8.22 +/- 0.34,P <.01)。具有较低的同行评估评分的学生也有可能被引用专业性流逝(差距= 6.25,95%CI [3.13,11.11],P <.01)。本研究强化了职业主义对同行评估的价值,这可能有助于帮助识别在医学院期间可能面临专业性风险的学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号