首页> 外文期刊>Current pain and headache reports. >Systematic Review of Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Radiofrequency for Management of Cervicogenic Headaches
【24h】

Systematic Review of Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Radiofrequency for Management of Cervicogenic Headaches

机译:系统综述射频消融和脉冲射频治疗宫颈癌的辐射

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Purpose of Review Cervicogenic headache (CHA) is a secondary headache which has a source in the upper cervical spine. Many traditional analgesic choices lack good efficacy in managing the associated pain. As a result, in management of CHA, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or pulse radiofrequency (PRF) has been tried with success. Our study investigated the use of RFA and PRF for the management of CHA. Recent Findings In the present investigation, a review of the literature was conducted using PubMed (1966 to February 2017). The quality assessment was determined using The Cochrane Risk of Bias. After initial search and consultation with experts, 34 articles were identified for initial review and 10 articles met inclusion for review. Criteria for inclusion were primarily based on identification of articles discussing cervicogenic headaches which were previously treatment resistant and occurred without any other pathology of the craniofacial region or inciting event such as trauma. Summary This systematic review demonstrated that RFA and PRFA provide very limited benefit in the management of CHA. At present, there is no high-quality RCT and/or strong non-RCTs to support the use of these techniques, despite numerous case reports which have demonstrated benefit. This review is one of the first to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of RFA and PRF in the management of CHA.
机译:摘要审查宫颈源性头痛(CHA)的目的是具有上颈椎的源极的次要头痛。许多传统的镇痛选择在管理相关疼痛时缺乏良好的功效。结果,在CHA的管理中,射频消融(RFA)或脉冲射频(PRF)已经取得了成功。我们的研究调查了使用RFA和PRF进行CHA的管理。最近在本调查中的调查结果,使用PubMed(1966年至2017年2月)进行了对文献的审查。使用偏倚的Cochrane风险确定质量评估。在与专家进行初步搜索和协商后,已确定34篇文章进行初次审查,并符合符合审查的10条。包合物的标准主要基于讨论讨论预先治疗的宫颈癌的物品和发生的物品,而没有颅面区域或煽动事件如创伤的任何其他病例。摘要此系统审查证明RFA和PRFA在CHA的管理方面提供了非常有限的益处。目前,尽管有许多案例报告,但目前没有高质量的RCT和/或强大的非RCT,以支持这些技术的使用,尽管有许多案例的报告已经证明有益。该审查是首批提供RFA和PRF在CHA管理中的使用概述之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号