首页> 外文期刊>CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology >On transfer learning for chatter detection in turning using wavelet packet transform and ensemble empirical mode decomposition
【24h】

On transfer learning for chatter detection in turning using wavelet packet transform and ensemble empirical mode decomposition

机译:在使用小波包变换的转向颤动检测中的转移学习与集合经验模式分解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The increasing availability of sensor data at machine tools makes automatic chatter detection algorithms a trending topic in metal cutting. Two prominent and advanced methods for feature extraction via signal decomposition are wavelet packet transform (WPT) and ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD). We apply these two methods to time series acquired from an acceleration sensor at the tool holder of a lathe. Different turning experiments with varying dynamic behavior of the machine tool structure were performed. We compare the performance of these two methods with support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression, random forest classification and gradient boosting combined with recursive feature elimination (RFE). We also show that the common WPT-based approach of choosing wavelet packets with the highest energy ratios as representative features for chatter does not always result in packets that enclose the chatter frequency, thus reducing the classification accuracy. Further, we test the transfer learning capability of each of these methods by training the classifier on one of the cutting configurations and then testing it on the other cases. It is found that when training and testing on data from the same cutting configuration both methods yield high accuracies reaching in one of the cases as high as 94% and 95%, respectively, for WPT and EEMD. However, our experimental results show that EEMD can outperform WPT in transfer learning applications with accuracy of up to 95%. (C) 2019 CIRP.
机译:在机床上的传感器数据的不断增加使自动颤动检测算法在金属切割中进行趋势主题。通过信号分解的两个突出和先进的特征提取方法是小波包变换(WPT)和集合经验模式分解(EEMD)。我们将这两种方法应用于从车床刀架的加速度传感器获取的时间序列。执行具有不同机床结构的不同动态行为的不同转型实验。我们将这两种方法的性能与支持向量机(SVM),逻辑回归,随机森林分类和渐变升压结合递归特征消除(RFE)。我们还表明,选择具有最高能量比的基于WPT的基于WPT分组作为喋喋不休的代表特征,并不总是导致包围颤频的分组,从而降低了分类精度。此外,我们通过在其中一个切割配置上训练分类器,然后在另一个情况下测试它来测试每个方法的传输学习能力。结果发现,当来自相同切割构型的数据的培训和测试,这两种方法都会产生高达94%和95%的病例的高精度,用于WPT和EEMD。然而,我们的实验结果表明,EEMD可以以高达95%的准确性转移学习应用程序的胜过。 (c)2019 CIRP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号