...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine: including molecular interventions >Novel Insights of Jailed Balloon and Jailed Corsair Technique for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Bifurcation Lesions
【24h】

Novel Insights of Jailed Balloon and Jailed Corsair Technique for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Bifurcation Lesions

机译:预防气球的新颖见解和被判入狱的Corsair技术,用于分叉病变的经皮冠状动脉干预

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The optimal technique for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a bifurcation lesion remains uncertain. JBT/JCT techniques are now emerging for protection of the side branch (SB). We aimed to compare jailed balloon (JBT) and jailed Corsair (JCT) techniques to the conventional jailed wire technique. Methods: We analyzed 850 consecutive patients (995 bifurcation lesions), who underwent PCI. The bifurcation lesions were classified as jailed wire (—), jailed wire (+), JBT, and JCT. We assessed temporary thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade <2, permanent TIMI flow grade <2 in the SB, and SB occlusion related myocardial infarction and compared these endpoints with inverse probability treatment weighted analysis. Results: The percentage of each group is as follows: jailed wire (—); 44.7%; jailed wire (+) 50.9%; JBT 1.7%; JCT 2.7%. The Corsair could not be delivered with a stent because of severe calcifications (3.7%) and a jailed balloon was entrapped with the stent after dilatation (5.9%). Compared to the jailed wire (+), JBT/JCT had a higher percentage of true bifurcations, arterial sheath size >7 Fr, and a lower proportion of wire recrossing (all, P < 0.05). After adjustment, temporary and permanent TIMI flow grade <2 in the SB, and SB occlusion related myocardial infarction were not significantly different (OR: 1.08, CI: 0.32-3.71, P = 0.90; OR: 0.88, CI: 0.11-6.91, P = 0.91; OR: 1.94, CI: 0.23-16.5, P = 0.55 respectively). Conclusions: Our data could not prove the efficacy of JBT/JCT, but revealed novel insights about these techniques. A larger study is necessary to prove the efficacy of JBT/JCT.
机译:背景:分叉病变的经皮冠状动脉干预(PCI)的最佳技术仍然不确定。现在正在出现JBT / JCT技术以保护侧支分支(SB)。我们的目标是将被判入狱的气球(JBT)和被判入狱的Corsair(JCT)技术与传统的被判入狱技术。方法:分析了850名连续患者(995个分叉病变),他们接受了PCI。分叉病变被归类为被判入狱( - ),监狱电线(+),JBT和JCT。我们评估了在SB中的心肌梗死(TIMI)流量级别<2,永久性TIMI流量<2中的临时溶栓,以及SB闭塞相关的心肌梗死,并与逆概率处理加权分析比较这些终点。结果:每组的百分比如下:被判入狱( - ); 44.7%;被判入狱(+)50.9%; JBT 1.7%; JCT 2.7%。由于严重的钙化(3.7%),可靠的钙质不能用支架递送(3.7%),并在扩张后用支架捕获入狱气球(5.9%)。与监狱电线(+)相比,JBT / JCT具有更高的真正分叉,动脉鞘尺寸> 7FR的百分比,以及较低比例的电线罗斯(全部,P <0.05)。在调整后,临时和永久的Timi流量级<2在Sb中,Sb闭塞相关的心肌梗死没有显着差异(或:1.08,CI:0.32-3.71,P = 0.90;或:0.88,CI:0.11-6.91, P = 0.91;或者:1.94,CI:0.23-16.5,P = 0.55分别)。结论:我们的数据无法证明JBT / JCT的功效,但揭示了对这些技术的新颖见解。需要更大的研究来证明JBT / JCT的功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号