首页> 外文期刊>Abdominal imaging. >CT of the pancreas: Comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques
【24h】

CT of the pancreas: Comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques

机译:胰腺CT:基于模型的迭代,自适应统计迭代和滤波反投影重建技术之间的图像质量和胰管描绘比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study is to compare CT images of the pancreas reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR), and filtered back projection (FBP) techniques for image quality and pancreatic duct (PD) depiction. Data from 40 patients with contrast-enhanced abdominal CT [CTDIvol: 10.3 ± 3.0 (mGy)] during the late arterial phase were reconstructed with FBP, 40% ASiR-FBP blending, and MBIR. Two radiologists assessed the depiction of the main PD, image noise, and overall image quality using 5-point scale independently. Objective CT value and noise were measured in the pancreatic parenchyma, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the PD was calculated. The Friedman test and post-hoc multiple comparisons with Bonferroni test following one-way ANOVA were used for qualitative and quantitative assessment, respectively. For the subjective assessment, scores for MBIR were significantly higher than those for FBP and 40% ASiR (all P < 0.001). No significant differences in CT values of the pancreatic parenchyma were noted among FBP, 40% ASiR, and MBIR images (P > 0.05). Objective image noise was significantly lower and CNR of the PD was higher with MBIR than with FBP and 40% ASiR (all P < 0.05). Our results suggest that pancreatic CT images reconstructed with MBIR have lower image noise, better image quality, and higher conspicuity and CNR of the PD compared with FBP and ASiR.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较胰腺CT图像与基于模型的迭代重建(MBIR),自适应统计迭代重建(ASiR)和滤波反投影(FBP)技术重建的图像质量和胰管(PD)描绘。用FBP,40%ASiR-FBP混合和MBIR重建了40例动脉晚期造影剂增强腹部CT的数据[CTDIvol:10.3±3.0(mGy)]。两名放射科医生使用5分制标尺独立评估了主要PD,图像噪声和整体图像质量的描述。测量胰腺实质中的客观CT值和噪声,并计算PD的对比噪声比(CNR)。采用单因素方差分析进行弗里德曼检验和事后多重比较与邦费罗尼检验进行定性和定量评估。对于主观评估,MBIR得分明显高于FBP和40%ASiR(所有P <0.001)。在FBP,40%ASiR和MBIR图像之间,未发现胰腺实质的CT值有显着差异(P> 0.05)。与FBP和40%ASiR相比,MBIR的客观图像噪声明显更低,PD的CNR更高(所有P <0.05)。我们的结果表明,与FBP和ASiR相比,MBIR重建的胰腺CT图像具有更低的图像噪声,更好的图像质量以及PD的显着性和CNR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号