首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science and Pollution Research >Effectiveness-based innovation or efficiency-based innovation? Trade-off and antecedents under the goal of ecological total-factor energy efficiency in China
【24h】

Effectiveness-based innovation or efficiency-based innovation? Trade-off and antecedents under the goal of ecological total-factor energy efficiency in China

机译:基于有效的创新或基于效率的创新? 在中国生态总系数能效目标下的权衡和前提

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pursuing innovation effect or efficiency is an important trade-off that Chinese local governments need to face in the process of developing economy and protecting the environment. From the perspective of the policy portfolio, we employ the industrial panel data of 30 provinces in China during 2000-2015 to analyze the impacts of effectiveness-based innovation and efficiency-based innovation on ecological total-factor energy efficiency (ETFEE), and further analyze the effects of command-and-control, market-based and voluntary environmental regulations on innovation. The findings reveal that (1) both effectiveness-based innovation and efficiency-based innovation have significant promoting effects on ETFEE. (2) Three types of environmental regulations have significantly inhibitory effects on effectiveness-based innovation and efficiency-based innovation. (3) The interaction term of command-and-control and market-based regulations plays a significant role in promoting effectiveness-based innovation and efficiency-based innovation, whereas the interaction term of market-based and voluntary regulations merely promotes efficiency-based innovation. The interaction term of three types of regulation only has a synergetic and positive effect on the efficiency-based innovation. Finally, this paper gives specific policy recommendations.
机译:追求创新效应或效率是中国地方政府需要面对发展经济和保护环境的过程的重要权衡。从政策组合的角度来看,我们在2000 - 2015年聘请中国30个省的工业面板数据分析基于效益创新效益型创新的生态全要素能源效率的影响(ETFEE),并进一步分析指挥控制,市场和自愿环境法规对创新的影响。调查结果表明,(1)基于有效性的创新和基于效率的创新对ETFEE具有显着的促进作用。 (2)三种环境法规对基于效率的创新和基于效率的创新具有显着的抑制作用。 (3)指挥控制和基于市场的法规的互动项在促进基于效果的创新和基于效率的创新方面发挥着重要作用,而基于市场和自愿法规的互动项仅仅促进基于效率的创新。三种规则的相互作用项仅对基于效率的创新产生了协同作用和积极影响。最后,本文给出了具体的政策建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号