Comparison between centrifugal partition chromatography and preparative liquid chromatography as first dimensions in off‐line two‐dimensional separation: Application to the isolation of multi‐targeted compounds from Edelweiss plant

摘要

Abstract Preparative two‐dimensional chromatography is gaining interest in the elucidation of complex samples as it allows the recovery of a large number of molecules without the risks inherent to tedious multi‐step sample preparation. While the second dimension is often selected to be liquid chromatography, it may be of interest to compare the specificities of two different techniques, namely liquid chromatography and centrifugal partition chromatography, to be used as first dimension. A fair comparison between off‐line CPCxLC and prepLCxLC in selective comprehensive mode for preparative purposes is carried out in this study, illustrated by the isolation of five compounds from high‐value Edelweiss plant. The method development of each configuration is achieved on laboratory scale instruments. The quality of separation is compared using 2D‐contour plots. The prepLCxLC exhibits a large separation space that leads to an overall large peak capacity, which is of great interest for complex samples. But its limited loading capacity involves a large number of 2 D runs increasing the running costs for preparative purposes. On the other hand, CPCxLC provides a low peak capacity due to the poor efficiency provided by CPC. However, this liquid‐liquid technique can be finely tuned to generate a high selectivity, decreasing the number of runs necessary to produce a limited number of target solutes.