...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America >Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech
【24h】

Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech

机译:噪声干扰和信息承载声学变化对理解模拟电声语音的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In simulations of electrical-acoustic stimulation (EAS), vocoded speech intelligibility is aided by preservation of low-frequency acoustic cues. However, the speech signal is often interrupted in everyday listening conditions, and effects of interruption on hybrid speech intelligibility are poorly understood. Additionally, listeners rely on information-bearing acoustic changes to understand full-spectrum speech (as measured by cochlea-scaled entropy [CSE]) and vocoded speech (CSECI), but how listeners utilize these informational changes to understand EAS speech is unclear. Here, normal-hearing participants heard noise-vocoded sentences with three to six spectral channels in two conditions: vocoder-only (80-8000 Hz) and simulated hybrid EAS (vocoded above 500 Hz; original acoustic signal below 500 Hz). In each sentence, four 80-ms intervals containing high-CSECI or low-CSECI acoustic changes were replaced with speech-shaped noise. As expected, performance improved with the preservation of low-frequency fine-structure cues (EAS). This improvement decreased for continuous EAS sentences as more spectral channels were added, but increased as more channels were added to noise-interrupted EAS sentences. Performance was impaired more when high-CSECI intervals were replaced by noise than when low-CSECI intervals were replaced, but this pattern did not differ across listening modes. Utilizing information-bearing acoustic changes to understand speech is predicted to generalize to cochlear implant users who receive EAS inputs. (C) 2016 Acoustical Society of America.
机译:在电声刺激(EAS)的模拟中,通过保留低频声音提示来辅助语音编码的语音清晰度。但是,语音信号经常在日常收听条件下被打断,并且对混合语音可懂度的影响了解得很少。此外,听众还依赖于带有信息的声学变化来理解全谱语音(通过耳蜗标度熵[CSE]衡量)和声码语音(CSECI),但是听众如何利用这些信息变化来理解EAS语音尚不清楚。在这里,听力正常的参与者在以下两种情况下听到具有三到六个频谱通道的噪声声编码句子:纯声码器(80-8000 Hz)和模拟混合EAS(声码高于500 Hz;原始声音信号低于500 Hz)。在每个句子中,将四个包含高CSECI或低CSECI声学变化的80毫秒间隔替换为语音形噪声。如预期的那样,通过保留低频精细结构提示(EAS)可以提高性能。对于连续EAS语句,此改进随着添加更多频谱通道而降低,但随着向噪声中断EAS语句添加更多通道而增加。当用高噪声间隔代替高CSECI间隔时,与用低噪声间隔代替低CSECI间隔相比,性能受到的损害更大,但是这种模式在聆听模式下没有差异。预计将利用信息传递的声学变化来理解语音,从而普遍适用于接收EAS输入的人工耳蜗用户。 (C)2016年美国声学学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号