首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Cannulated screw and cable are superior to modified tension band in the treatment of transverse patella fractures.
【24h】

Cannulated screw and cable are superior to modified tension band in the treatment of transverse patella fractures.

机译:空心螺钉和电缆在治疗骨横突骨折方面优于改良张力带。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although the modified tension band technique (eg, tension band supplemented by longitudinal Kirschner wires) has long been the mainstay for fixation of transverse fractures of the patella, it has shortcomings, such as bad reduction, loosening of implants, and skin irritation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We conducted a retrospective comparison of the modified tension band technique and the titanium cable-cannulated screw tension band technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 101 patients aged 22 to 85 years (mean, 56.6 years) with AO/OTA 34-C1 fractures (n = 68) and 34-C2 fractures (n = 33). Fifty-two patients were in the modified tension band group and 49 were in the titanium cable-cannulated screw tension band group. Followup was at least 1 year (range, 1-3 years). Comparison criteria were fracture reduction, fracture healing time, and the Iowa score for knee function. RESULTS: The titanium cable-cannulated screw tension band group showed improved fracture reduction, reduced healing time, and better Iowa score, compared with the modified tension band group. In the modified tension band group, eight patients experienced wire migration, three of these requiring a second operation. There were no complications in the titanium cable-cannulated screw tension band group. CONCLUSIONS: The titanium cable-cannulated screw tension band technique showed superior results and should be considered as an alternative method for treatment of transverse patellar fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:尽管改良的张力带技术(例如,纵向克氏针补充张力带)长期以来一直是固定fix骨横向骨折的主要手段,但它具有诸如复位不良,植入物松弛和皮肤刺激等缺点。问题/目的:我们对改良的张力带技术和钛电缆空心螺钉张力带技术进行了回顾性比较。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了101例年龄在22至85岁(平均56.6岁)的AO / OTA 34-C1骨折(n = 68)和34-C2骨折(n = 33)的患者。改良张力带组52例,钛缆空心螺钉张力带组49例。随访至少1年(范围1-3年)。比较标准为骨折复位,骨折愈合时间和爱荷华州膝关节功能评分。结果:与改良张力带组相比,钛缆空心螺钉张力带组显示出更好的骨折复位,更短的愈合时间和更好的爱荷华州评分。在改良张力带组中,八名患者经历了金属丝迁移,其中三名需要第二次手术。钛电缆空心螺钉张力带组无并发症。结论:钛电缆空心钉张力带技术显示了优异的效果,应被视为治疗transverse骨横断骨折的替代方法。证据级别:III级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整说明,请参见《作者指南》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号