首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV >Clinical evaluation of four recombinant Treponema pallidum antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests for syphilis.
【24h】

Clinical evaluation of four recombinant Treponema pallidum antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests for syphilis.

机译:基于梅毒螺旋体梅毒螺旋体的四个快速诊断检测的临床评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and feasibility of four rapid tests in the diagnosis of syphilis in sexually transmitted disease diagnosis and treatment centre of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. METHODS: Tests were performed on consecutive clinic attendees, using whole blood in the clinic, and whole blood and serum in the laboratory. The sensitivity and specificity of each test was evaluated, using a standard treponemal test (Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay) as the gold standard. RESULTS: The results are as follows. Abbott Determine Syphilis TP test: for serum specimens, the sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 98.9%; for whole blood specimens, the sensitivity was 81.9% and specificity was 99.4%. SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 test: for serum specimens, the sensitivity was 95.5% and specificity was 97.9%; for whole blood specimens, the sensitivity was 87.6% and specificity was 99.4%. VisiTect-Syphilis test: for serum specimens, the sensitivity was 94.0% and specificity was 98.1%; for whole blood specimens, the sensitivity was 73.5% and specificity was 99.7%. Syphicheck-WB test: for serum specimens, the sensitivity was 67.4% and specificity was 98.8%; for whole blood specimens, the sensitivity was 64.0% and specificity was 99.7%. CONCLUSION: We therefore strongly believe that rapid serological tests for syphilis are an acceptable alternative to conventional laboratory tests. Since they do not require equipment or electricity, they could increase coverage of syphilis screening, and enable treatment to be given at the first clinic visit.
机译:目的:评估北京协和医院性传播疾病诊治中心梅毒诊断中四种快速检测方法的敏感性,特异性和可行性。方法:对连续的临床参与者进行测试,使用诊所的全血以及实验室的全血和血清。使用标准的梅毒测试(梅毒螺旋体血凝试验)作为金标准,评估了每种测试的敏感性和特异性。结果:结果如下。雅培确定梅毒TP试验:对于血清标本,敏感性为100%,特异性为98.9%;对于全血标本,敏感性为81.9%,特异性为99.4%。 SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0测试:对于血清标本,敏感性为95.5%,特异性为97.9%;对于全血标本,敏感性为87.6%,特异性为99.4%。 VisiTect-Syphilis试验:对于血清样品,敏感性为94.0%,特异性为98.1%;对于全血标本,敏感性为73.5%,特异性为99.7%。 Syphicheck-WB检测:血清标本的敏感性为67.4%,特异性为98.8%。对于全血标本,敏感性为64.0%,特异性为99.7%。结论:因此,我们坚信梅毒的快速血清学检查是常规实验室检查的一种可接受的替代方法。由于它们不需要设备或电力,因此可以扩大梅毒筛查的覆盖率,并使首次就诊就可以进行治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号